This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Somerset Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Somerset, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Somerset on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SomersetWikipedia:WikiProject SomersetTemplate:WikiProject SomersetSomerset articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Historic sites Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

I have made a start on adding references where there are citation needed tags, but if anyone has access to other sources, perhaps those listed in the bibliography, please help. The link to Le Despenser needs to be disambiguated. There are quite a few peacock phrases - everyone mentions seems to be the most important, strongest, fastest etc which need to either be removed or a reference given to the source of the claim. There also seems to be significant duplication between sections eg the information that "The de Bohun family were the chief patrons of manuscript illumination in England in the late middle ages" which is not that relevant to Naish Priory appears in 2 separate sections. Any help with tackling these issues to improve the article appreciated.— Rod ^talk 12:25, 5 December 2010 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Naish Priory. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110718025019/http://www.weissgallery.com/ENGLISH-SCHOOL-Two-young-children-repute-from-the-Courtenay-family-possibly-Anne-1630-and-Susan-1632-Courtenay-DesktopDefault.aspx?tabid=52&tabindex=51&objectid=174242&categoryid=7969 to http://www.weissgallery.com/ENGLISH-SCHOOL-Two-young-children-repute-from-the-Courtenay-family-possibly-Anne-1630-and-Susan-1632-Courtenay-DesktopDefault.aspx?tabid=52&tabindex=51&objectid=174242&categoryid=7969

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:38, 11 February 2018 (UTC) reply