![]() | This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
Name has not been officially or legally changed to Nadigar Sangam. Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 20:40, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
I think this section should be created into a new article. It is too large and notable enough as an event. 173.33.180.117 ( talk) 16:04, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Someone has added an undue weight tag and NPOV tag. To reduce weight, it should be split. I don't see anything that dampens the article's point of view. So far, everything stated are facts and not opinion. 173.33.180.117 ( talk) 01:02, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
When Controversies related to Vishwaroopam has it's own article why not 2015 Nadigar Sangam election? I hope a registered user could make this move. 173.33.180.117 ( talk) 20:29, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
Name has not been officially or legally changed to Nadigar Sangam. Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 20:40, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
I think this section should be created into a new article. It is too large and notable enough as an event. 173.33.180.117 ( talk) 16:04, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Someone has added an undue weight tag and NPOV tag. To reduce weight, it should be split. I don't see anything that dampens the article's point of view. So far, everything stated are facts and not opinion. 173.33.180.117 ( talk) 01:02, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
When Controversies related to Vishwaroopam has it's own article why not 2015 Nadigar Sangam election? I hope a registered user could make this move. 173.33.180.117 ( talk) 20:29, 20 October 2015 (UTC)