This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on NUR Reactor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:42, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
This rather took me by surprise.
Anyone know what it's about? I get a million and a quarter ghits for NUR reactor -Wikipedia so there should be no trouble finding sources to satisfy the letter of the GNG if needed, but to me pure commonsense would indicate that this is a notable topic and a useful stub. Other comments? Andrewa ( talk) 01:12, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
Copy-edit of discussion, along with my points, to this article. I feel it is necessary to include here rather than bothering with cross referencing the talk pages of this article and my user page. UtopianPoyzin ( talk) 02:02, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
"Reminder to maybe propose an AfD for NUR Reactor, created by User:Andrewa, which may be hard to get by... UtopianPoyzin ( talk) 06:24, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
An explanation has been published here and now above. Probably no further action required here... other than improving the article of course!
But as also pointed out in the reply above, Articles on RA-6 and Centre de Dévéloppement des Techniques Nucléaires (both redlinks in the current stub) would also be good IMO. 15000 ghits (most look relevant)... and [ https://www.google.com/search?ei=BgviXMr9OonnvgSC_q3YAg&q=%22Centre+de+D%C3%A9v%C3%A9loppement+des+Techniques+Nucl%C3%A9aires%22+-Wikipedia&oq=%22Centre+de+D%C3%A9v%C3%A9loppement+des+Techniques+Nucl%C3%A9aires%22+-wikipedia 22000 ghits] (all look relevant) respectively.
We seem to have a great many editors willing to write about nuclear accidents and nuclear power phaseout and similar topics. The positive side of the nuclear industry gets relatively little attention. Andrewa ( talk) 02:18, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
Any of these (if proven to be reliable, obviously) could yield to be more than beneficial for this article as well. Glad we were able to make some progress Andrewa! I'd be happy to help here if you need my assistance! UtopianPoyzin ( talk) 02:50, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on NUR Reactor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:42, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
This rather took me by surprise.
Anyone know what it's about? I get a million and a quarter ghits for NUR reactor -Wikipedia so there should be no trouble finding sources to satisfy the letter of the GNG if needed, but to me pure commonsense would indicate that this is a notable topic and a useful stub. Other comments? Andrewa ( talk) 01:12, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
Copy-edit of discussion, along with my points, to this article. I feel it is necessary to include here rather than bothering with cross referencing the talk pages of this article and my user page. UtopianPoyzin ( talk) 02:02, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
"Reminder to maybe propose an AfD for NUR Reactor, created by User:Andrewa, which may be hard to get by... UtopianPoyzin ( talk) 06:24, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
An explanation has been published here and now above. Probably no further action required here... other than improving the article of course!
But as also pointed out in the reply above, Articles on RA-6 and Centre de Dévéloppement des Techniques Nucléaires (both redlinks in the current stub) would also be good IMO. 15000 ghits (most look relevant)... and [ https://www.google.com/search?ei=BgviXMr9OonnvgSC_q3YAg&q=%22Centre+de+D%C3%A9v%C3%A9loppement+des+Techniques+Nucl%C3%A9aires%22+-Wikipedia&oq=%22Centre+de+D%C3%A9v%C3%A9loppement+des+Techniques+Nucl%C3%A9aires%22+-wikipedia 22000 ghits] (all look relevant) respectively.
We seem to have a great many editors willing to write about nuclear accidents and nuclear power phaseout and similar topics. The positive side of the nuclear industry gets relatively little attention. Andrewa ( talk) 02:18, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
Any of these (if proven to be reliable, obviously) could yield to be more than beneficial for this article as well. Glad we were able to make some progress Andrewa! I'd be happy to help here if you need my assistance! UtopianPoyzin ( talk) 02:50, 20 May 2019 (UTC)