This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
When the category "Free Linux Software" was deleted this page was automatically removed from it, fair enough. But why didn't the bot add it to the category "Free Software" when it wasn't there? This is kind of important for Nedit, because it was under a restrictive licence many years ago, and many in the linux community still believe that it is non-free.
The development of nedit seems dead. No updates in over a year. Such a shame cause Nedit was starting to become a very nice editor.
There are trickle updates to the nedit repository, last was in April 11. They are looking for new hosting, so its not dead yet, thank goodness, as its very useful for me. Vicarage ( talk) 08:20, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
More needed here - this is an old text editor, extraordinarily very well documented, and pretty mature. It's hangable, as all old mastodon editors, and extremely adaptable to various markups and proglani. It's a pity it can only handle 8bit characters (non-wide) AFAIK. I'll add this to my watch list in order to improve. Said: Rursus ( ☻) 10:36, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
Nedit has their own wiki for additional information. http://nedit.hackvalue.nl/niki/index.php/Main_Page
One of the nicer parts is: Customising Nedit: http://nedit.hackvalue.nl/niki/index.php/Customizing_NEdit
Improving the look of Motif on Nedit: http://nedit.hackvalue.nl/niki/index.php/Look_Tuning
Perhaps this editor may no longer be hangable; or time to the gallows is in the process of being appealed (stay of execution, literally). Any word from the Governor? No cracks about vi/vim. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.174.7.187 ( talk) 01:08, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
How is a project that had a release 3 months ago "inactive"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.233.212.35 ( talk) 17:54, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on NEdit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 14:18, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Original NEdit is still maintained at https://sourceforge.net/p/nedit/
There are also forks:
HenningThielemann ( talk) 18:44, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Why is nedit-ng not mentioned in the article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.114.153.144 ( talk) 21:21, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
When the category "Free Linux Software" was deleted this page was automatically removed from it, fair enough. But why didn't the bot add it to the category "Free Software" when it wasn't there? This is kind of important for Nedit, because it was under a restrictive licence many years ago, and many in the linux community still believe that it is non-free.
The development of nedit seems dead. No updates in over a year. Such a shame cause Nedit was starting to become a very nice editor.
There are trickle updates to the nedit repository, last was in April 11. They are looking for new hosting, so its not dead yet, thank goodness, as its very useful for me. Vicarage ( talk) 08:20, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
More needed here - this is an old text editor, extraordinarily very well documented, and pretty mature. It's hangable, as all old mastodon editors, and extremely adaptable to various markups and proglani. It's a pity it can only handle 8bit characters (non-wide) AFAIK. I'll add this to my watch list in order to improve. Said: Rursus ( ☻) 10:36, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
Nedit has their own wiki for additional information. http://nedit.hackvalue.nl/niki/index.php/Main_Page
One of the nicer parts is: Customising Nedit: http://nedit.hackvalue.nl/niki/index.php/Customizing_NEdit
Improving the look of Motif on Nedit: http://nedit.hackvalue.nl/niki/index.php/Look_Tuning
Perhaps this editor may no longer be hangable; or time to the gallows is in the process of being appealed (stay of execution, literally). Any word from the Governor? No cracks about vi/vim. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.174.7.187 ( talk) 01:08, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
How is a project that had a release 3 months ago "inactive"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.233.212.35 ( talk) 17:54, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on NEdit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 14:18, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Original NEdit is still maintained at https://sourceforge.net/p/nedit/
There are also forks:
HenningThielemann ( talk) 18:44, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Why is nedit-ng not mentioned in the article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.114.153.144 ( talk) 21:21, 25 August 2022 (UTC)