This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Greetings, all. After a few additions, the article seems adequately sourced, in that it cites
independent, secondary sources containing text devoted at length to the article's subject.
Ravensfire, would you agree? -
The Gnome (
talk) 17:42, 1 September 2018 (UTC)reply
AGREE. Thank you
The Gnome for having created this entry. The article is indeed adequately sourced in the sense that the sources used are RS.
Schullerius (
talk) 20:35, 26 September 2018 (UTC)reply
At the same time I have to admit to detect a bias in the article towards Modern Monetary Theory (Mosler, Wray, Mitchell), which school of thought is critical of the monetary analyses underlying the NEED Act. This lopsidedness will have to be balanced by sources which embrace what Prof. Jospeh Huber calls
New Currency Theory (Steve Keen, Richard Werner, Stephen Zarlenga, Michael Kumhof), which are in harmony with the thinking underlying the NEED Act, though not all of these sources would use that name. The article will also have to be filled out a little more with relevant sources mentioning the NEED Act as found in Google Scholar
"National Emergency Employment Defense Act".
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Greetings, all. After a few additions, the article seems adequately sourced, in that it cites
independent, secondary sources containing text devoted at length to the article's subject.
Ravensfire, would you agree? -
The Gnome (
talk) 17:42, 1 September 2018 (UTC)reply
AGREE. Thank you
The Gnome for having created this entry. The article is indeed adequately sourced in the sense that the sources used are RS.
Schullerius (
talk) 20:35, 26 September 2018 (UTC)reply
At the same time I have to admit to detect a bias in the article towards Modern Monetary Theory (Mosler, Wray, Mitchell), which school of thought is critical of the monetary analyses underlying the NEED Act. This lopsidedness will have to be balanced by sources which embrace what Prof. Jospeh Huber calls
New Currency Theory (Steve Keen, Richard Werner, Stephen Zarlenga, Michael Kumhof), which are in harmony with the thinking underlying the NEED Act, though not all of these sources would use that name. The article will also have to be filled out a little more with relevant sources mentioning the NEED Act as found in Google Scholar
"National Emergency Employment Defense Act".