![]() | Mysore literature in Kannada is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the archive. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Text and/or other creative content from Mysore literature in Kannada was copied or moved into Tirumalarya with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Image:Sarvajna Manauscipts.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 00:15, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
"His contributions to treatises on music include Nija Dipika Ratna, Anubhava Rasayana, Bhakti Marga Sarovara and Gnana Sarovara, both with eighty six compositions, and a host of sangatya, gadya, vachana compositions and eighteen philosophical compositions in the work Shalyada Arasinavara Tikina Kirtane."
I'm not sure exactly what this means - what two compositions does "both" refer to? I've left it as is for now, because I don't want to change the intended meaning. Damanmundine1 11:43, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
You are in the middle of a FAR on Kingdom of Mysore, in which one of the issues being discussed is the page name "Kingdom of Mysore" and whether it is appropriate. This page name includes "Kingdom of Mysore" as an integral part; furthermore, it is the mother article of a section in the Kingdom of Mysore page. You cannot simply change the name without informing anyone on this talk page, and, to boot, check the "minor edit" box in the edit notes. This is a very controversial move and it has to be done through the proper channels. Before you can even attempt to do that though, you need to conduct a discussion on this talk and provide your reasons for requesting this move. Regards, Fowler&fowler «Talk» 21:34, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
(unindent)What I am suggesting is not that the sub-article's name "remain frozen," but rather that when such a name change involves issues related to the FAR (and explicitly discussed in My concerns (#5)), it should be discussed on the talk page first. The page move certainly shouldn't be made without any explanation anywhere and with the "minor edit" box checked. Regards, Fowler&fowler «Talk» 22:41, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
Dear user:Sarvagnya, Could you please explain why you removed my three posts, which presented evidence for both why the recent page move was controversial and why the sources used in this article are flawed? The edits I refer to are:
I just reread WP:TALK.
Please reply below. Best regards, Fowler&fowler «Talk» 00:57, 18 December 2008 (UTC) |
Dear user:Dineshkannambadi, Since you have recently changed the page name from Kannada literature in the Kingdom of Mysore to Kannada literature, 1600–1900 CE without requesting a move or initiating any concurrent discussion on the talk page, I'd like to ask you a few questions. During the period mid-September 2007 to mid-October 2007, this page was copy edited by, among others, User:Damanmundine1 and User:Writtenright; see history. In this edit of 12:54 13 October 2007, user:Damanmundine1, changed the name of the page, from its original name, Mysore Kingdom literature, to its longest-lasting name, Literature of the Kingdom of Mysore. Furthermore user:Damanmundine1 cited "consistency with other Kingdom of Mysore sub-articles," in this edit summary. I have provided full details of the history of the name changes of this page in my subpage: A record of the creation of this page and its name changes In light of the evidence:
Very best regards, Fowler&fowler «Talk» 14:17, 18 December 2008 (UTC) |
Dear user:Dineshkannambadi, The content of the page Kannada literature in the Kingdom of Mysore included the literature of the "Kingdom of Mysore" until the year 1947 (when the Princely State of Mysore acceded to the Union of India). I have included brief outline of the coverage of Kannada literature of the period 1900–1947 on my subpage: Name change: What about the period 1900–1947? .
Very best regards, Fowler&fowler «Talk» 14:37, 18 December 2008 (UTC) |
This is just the lead. As I've already indicated, each of the three sentences of the third paragraph in the lead has similar problems. Doesn't bode well for an article aspiring to be an FA. Fowler&fowler «Talk» 02:05, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
The image originally had a caption that simply said, "Mysore Palace." After I made my first post in the FAC referring to the image, user:Dineshkannambadi changed it to "Mysore palace, centre of the court and its literary circle." Now when I've asked (in the FAC) what literary circle was he talking about (since the palace was inaugurated in 1912 and the literature's scope ends in the "early 20th century"), he has changed the caption to be about the archives (with two "citations" as well)!
Reviewer: - Spaceman Spiff 01:19, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
I will review this article. I'll take a look and note my initial comments over the next few hours. - Spaceman Spiff 01:19, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
These comments are based on a cursory reading of the article, not a detailed review.
I'll add more later (I have a fair bit on first look), but I hope the nominator can comment on these before we delve in. - Spaceman Spiff 03:01, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
Clarification: The above mentioned points were just first comments to get started, there are quite a lot, especially related to quality of sources and verification of what the sources say. I think using {{ Harvnb}} cites can be done at the end after the content is finalized. cheers. - Spaceman Spiff 12:03, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
I notice that the article was moved from Kannada literature in the Kingdom of Mysore to Mysore literature in Kannada. I'm ok with any title but this seems a bit odd since Mysore is a noun but there should be an adjective there instead. Mysorean literature? Or, Literature of Mysore. Or Kannada literature from Mysore. -- regentspark ( comment) 18:00, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
![]() | Mysore literature in Kannada is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the archive. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Text and/or other creative content from Mysore literature in Kannada was copied or moved into Tirumalarya with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Image:Sarvajna Manauscipts.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 00:15, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
"His contributions to treatises on music include Nija Dipika Ratna, Anubhava Rasayana, Bhakti Marga Sarovara and Gnana Sarovara, both with eighty six compositions, and a host of sangatya, gadya, vachana compositions and eighteen philosophical compositions in the work Shalyada Arasinavara Tikina Kirtane."
I'm not sure exactly what this means - what two compositions does "both" refer to? I've left it as is for now, because I don't want to change the intended meaning. Damanmundine1 11:43, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
You are in the middle of a FAR on Kingdom of Mysore, in which one of the issues being discussed is the page name "Kingdom of Mysore" and whether it is appropriate. This page name includes "Kingdom of Mysore" as an integral part; furthermore, it is the mother article of a section in the Kingdom of Mysore page. You cannot simply change the name without informing anyone on this talk page, and, to boot, check the "minor edit" box in the edit notes. This is a very controversial move and it has to be done through the proper channels. Before you can even attempt to do that though, you need to conduct a discussion on this talk and provide your reasons for requesting this move. Regards, Fowler&fowler «Talk» 21:34, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
(unindent)What I am suggesting is not that the sub-article's name "remain frozen," but rather that when such a name change involves issues related to the FAR (and explicitly discussed in My concerns (#5)), it should be discussed on the talk page first. The page move certainly shouldn't be made without any explanation anywhere and with the "minor edit" box checked. Regards, Fowler&fowler «Talk» 22:41, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
Dear user:Sarvagnya, Could you please explain why you removed my three posts, which presented evidence for both why the recent page move was controversial and why the sources used in this article are flawed? The edits I refer to are:
I just reread WP:TALK.
Please reply below. Best regards, Fowler&fowler «Talk» 00:57, 18 December 2008 (UTC) |
Dear user:Dineshkannambadi, Since you have recently changed the page name from Kannada literature in the Kingdom of Mysore to Kannada literature, 1600–1900 CE without requesting a move or initiating any concurrent discussion on the talk page, I'd like to ask you a few questions. During the period mid-September 2007 to mid-October 2007, this page was copy edited by, among others, User:Damanmundine1 and User:Writtenright; see history. In this edit of 12:54 13 October 2007, user:Damanmundine1, changed the name of the page, from its original name, Mysore Kingdom literature, to its longest-lasting name, Literature of the Kingdom of Mysore. Furthermore user:Damanmundine1 cited "consistency with other Kingdom of Mysore sub-articles," in this edit summary. I have provided full details of the history of the name changes of this page in my subpage: A record of the creation of this page and its name changes In light of the evidence:
Very best regards, Fowler&fowler «Talk» 14:17, 18 December 2008 (UTC) |
Dear user:Dineshkannambadi, The content of the page Kannada literature in the Kingdom of Mysore included the literature of the "Kingdom of Mysore" until the year 1947 (when the Princely State of Mysore acceded to the Union of India). I have included brief outline of the coverage of Kannada literature of the period 1900–1947 on my subpage: Name change: What about the period 1900–1947? .
Very best regards, Fowler&fowler «Talk» 14:37, 18 December 2008 (UTC) |
This is just the lead. As I've already indicated, each of the three sentences of the third paragraph in the lead has similar problems. Doesn't bode well for an article aspiring to be an FA. Fowler&fowler «Talk» 02:05, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
The image originally had a caption that simply said, "Mysore Palace." After I made my first post in the FAC referring to the image, user:Dineshkannambadi changed it to "Mysore palace, centre of the court and its literary circle." Now when I've asked (in the FAC) what literary circle was he talking about (since the palace was inaugurated in 1912 and the literature's scope ends in the "early 20th century"), he has changed the caption to be about the archives (with two "citations" as well)!
Reviewer: - Spaceman Spiff 01:19, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
I will review this article. I'll take a look and note my initial comments over the next few hours. - Spaceman Spiff 01:19, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
These comments are based on a cursory reading of the article, not a detailed review.
I'll add more later (I have a fair bit on first look), but I hope the nominator can comment on these before we delve in. - Spaceman Spiff 03:01, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
Clarification: The above mentioned points were just first comments to get started, there are quite a lot, especially related to quality of sources and verification of what the sources say. I think using {{ Harvnb}} cites can be done at the end after the content is finalized. cheers. - Spaceman Spiff 12:03, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
I notice that the article was moved from Kannada literature in the Kingdom of Mysore to Mysore literature in Kannada. I'm ok with any title but this seems a bit odd since Mysore is a noun but there should be an adjective there instead. Mysorean literature? Or, Literature of Mysore. Or Kannada literature from Mysore. -- regentspark ( comment) 18:00, 28 September 2012 (UTC)