![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Environment, Women scientists, and India. V00d00Child ( talk) 05:02, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
OK, yeah, there's work that needs to be done. Copyedits, but that's not the biggest deal. One thing to do is to consolidate these references--you got individual footnotes to cite individual pages, with the entire article in that note. I always use a version of MLA to tackle that, but there are fancier methods; a few days ago an editor made a simple edit that took care of that, but I forgot what it was. At any rate, I suggest you make a separate bibliography, and then have a section for footnotes. Look at today's featured article, Donnchadh, Earl of Carrick; that article does it that way (with that crazy bibliography...). And that article, by the way, was written/promoted by some of the best writers we have on Wikipedia.
As for the article as a whole-- Xanthomelanoussprog, Shock Brigade Harvester Boris, you two are pretty clever and can better judge an overview than I can; would you mind helping a fellow Wikipedian out a bit, with some hints and tips? This article makes or breaks the student's grade, so no pressure, moral or otherwise. Dr Aaij ( talk) 03:29, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Overall I think the article is interesting and well structured. Shock Brigade Harvester Boris ( talk) 03:34, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available
on the course page. Peer reviewers:
Sir.Leyenda.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 01:20, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Environment, Women scientists, and India. V00d00Child ( talk) 05:02, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
OK, yeah, there's work that needs to be done. Copyedits, but that's not the biggest deal. One thing to do is to consolidate these references--you got individual footnotes to cite individual pages, with the entire article in that note. I always use a version of MLA to tackle that, but there are fancier methods; a few days ago an editor made a simple edit that took care of that, but I forgot what it was. At any rate, I suggest you make a separate bibliography, and then have a section for footnotes. Look at today's featured article, Donnchadh, Earl of Carrick; that article does it that way (with that crazy bibliography...). And that article, by the way, was written/promoted by some of the best writers we have on Wikipedia.
As for the article as a whole-- Xanthomelanoussprog, Shock Brigade Harvester Boris, you two are pretty clever and can better judge an overview than I can; would you mind helping a fellow Wikipedian out a bit, with some hints and tips? This article makes or breaks the student's grade, so no pressure, moral or otherwise. Dr Aaij ( talk) 03:29, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Overall I think the article is interesting and well structured. Shock Brigade Harvester Boris ( talk) 03:34, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available
on the course page. Peer reviewers:
Sir.Leyenda.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 01:20, 18 January 2022 (UTC)