![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
There was a discussion which ended in delete concerning this article in early 2008. Consensus of the discussion indicated that as production had not begun at that time, there was not enough concrete information to begin an article and that the article should be deleted. The article was later deleted again when it was re-created prior to production. This history is available here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Special:Log&page=My_Name_is_Khan
Production on the film began in late December 2008. As consensus indicated that the article should be restored or recreated with references once production began, I created a new article. I also notified one of the admins who deleted previous versions and was asked by this admin to leave a note for future admins to say that we should not delete this article again. Please leave a message on my talk page if you would like to discuss this with me. Thank you, - Classicfilms ( talk) 21:33, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
The result of the proposal was move.
Anthony Appleyard (
talk)
05:43, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Support: Ok. Preserving the page history was my major hesitation but if that can be taken care of then it's fine with me. The article is linked to a number of others so we'll also have to make certain that all the redirects will work.- Classicfilms ( talk) 15:28, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Since it appears we have a consensus to move, there is simply the issue of procedure. I am wondering if a faster way to go about this would be for someone to add the WP:PROD tag to the redirect page that is now existing for the all caps version of this title (My Name Is Khan):
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=My_Name_Is_Khan&redirect=no
with an explanation linking back to this discussion. That process should delete the redirect which would then make a move of the real article ( My Name is Khan) straight forward. - Classicfilms ( talk) 16:34, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
There is absolutely no reason to create separate archives for every thread. There's no reason to archive a Talk page at all that's only ever had two threads posted. You're just making it a lot harder for people to find and view past discussions. Propaniac ( talk) 19:49, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
I just want to mention here that "Khan" is not only a Muslim name, it is also shared by many Hindus of India. The Americans don't know. Besides Genghis Khan himself was not a Muslim. Ummat ( talk) 13:01, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
each and every film done by this actor gives us an importent lesson and his upcomming movie will also teach us something, so plz dont miss it. GO AND WATCH. HADI ( talk) 13:01, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
This section claims that Khan was "released with an apology", but neither of the citations mentions an apology. Can anyone verify that an apology was made?
Also, if this article is true -- http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/us/Heat-on-SRK-was-because-of-scanner-on-Bollywood-shows/articleshow/4916759.cms -- it seems that an apology was not in order. The authorities appear to have known exactly who SRK was and were concerned about his, shall we say, unorthodox business connections! 141.211.8.17 ( talk) 16:52, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
I have reverted removal of soundtrack details. My Name Is Khan Soundtrack is redirected back to this article. -- Redtigerxyz Talk 07:33, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
There was a discussion which ended in delete concerning this article in early 2008. Consensus of the discussion indicated that as production had not begun at that time, there was not enough concrete information to begin an article and that the article should be deleted. The article was later deleted again when it was re-created prior to production. This history is available here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Special:Log&page=My_Name_is_Khan
Production on the film began in late December 2008. As consensus indicated that the article should be restored or recreated with references once production began, I created a new article. I also notified one of the admins who deleted previous versions and was asked by this admin to leave a note for future admins to say that we should not delete this article again. Please leave a message on my talk page if you would like to discuss this with me. Thank you, - Classicfilms ( talk) 21:33, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
The result of the proposal was move.
Anthony Appleyard (
talk)
05:43, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Support: Ok. Preserving the page history was my major hesitation but if that can be taken care of then it's fine with me. The article is linked to a number of others so we'll also have to make certain that all the redirects will work.- Classicfilms ( talk) 15:28, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Since it appears we have a consensus to move, there is simply the issue of procedure. I am wondering if a faster way to go about this would be for someone to add the WP:PROD tag to the redirect page that is now existing for the all caps version of this title (My Name Is Khan):
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=My_Name_Is_Khan&redirect=no
with an explanation linking back to this discussion. That process should delete the redirect which would then make a move of the real article ( My Name is Khan) straight forward. - Classicfilms ( talk) 16:34, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
There is absolutely no reason to create separate archives for every thread. There's no reason to archive a Talk page at all that's only ever had two threads posted. You're just making it a lot harder for people to find and view past discussions. Propaniac ( talk) 19:49, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
I just want to mention here that "Khan" is not only a Muslim name, it is also shared by many Hindus of India. The Americans don't know. Besides Genghis Khan himself was not a Muslim. Ummat ( talk) 13:01, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
each and every film done by this actor gives us an importent lesson and his upcomming movie will also teach us something, so plz dont miss it. GO AND WATCH. HADI ( talk) 13:01, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
This section claims that Khan was "released with an apology", but neither of the citations mentions an apology. Can anyone verify that an apology was made?
Also, if this article is true -- http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/us/Heat-on-SRK-was-because-of-scanner-on-Bollywood-shows/articleshow/4916759.cms -- it seems that an apology was not in order. The authorities appear to have known exactly who SRK was and were concerned about his, shall we say, unorthodox business connections! 141.211.8.17 ( talk) 16:52, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
I have reverted removal of soundtrack details. My Name Is Khan Soundtrack is redirected back to this article. -- Redtigerxyz Talk 07:33, 23 January 2010 (UTC)