Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Hahc21 ( talk · contribs) 00:00, 15 June 2012 (UTC) reply

Review

First comments

• Lead paragraph too long as a single one. Split into 2. (already done)
• No sample? =(
  • Idk how to upload them. Till 13:22, 15 June 2012 (UTC) reply
    • I'll upload it for you =). — Hahc21 ^{[ TALK][ CONTRIBS} 14:20, 15 June 2012 (UTC) reply
      • Thanks! :) Till 02:06, 16 June 2012 (UTC) reply

Ok, i've read the entire article and is flawless on prose. Checking the references by tomorrow. — Hahc21 ^{[ TALK][ CONTRIBS} 03:16, 15 June 2012 (UTC) reply

References

• We have a problem with reference No.12. When using the {{ singlechart}} template for Slovakia, week and year are mandatory for the chart to properly work. You didn't specified those parameters and thus the chart position is unverifiable. Could you please add them? =)

— Hahc21 ^{[ TALK][ CONTRIBS} 21:47, 15 June 2012 (UTC) reply

Fixed. Till 02:06, 16 June 2012 (UTC) reply

Verdict

Ok, i'll upload the sample later, everything is done.

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose): b ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c ( OR): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

— Hahc 21 02:11, 16 June 2012 (UTC) reply

Thanks Hahc21. Till 03:22, 16 June 2012 (UTC) reply