Mwng has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Mwng article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
ysbeidiau heulog is on songbook (at least the uk edition), so the bit about no songs being on songbook is wrong- and entirely appropriate, since it was the only single from mwng
The translation of Mwng is given as Mane, which is a disambig page. I assume that it means the mane of a Lion and not the mane of a horse, but I don't speak Welsh. If it does, indeed, refer to that of a Lion, it could point to Lion#Hair_.26_mane. I guess if it's really the same as the English "Mane", then it's entirely ambiguous and should point where it already does... Oh well. It was a thought anyway. — gogobera ( talk) 22:46, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Cavie, I saw your query about citation styles on FAC talk. I can't advise about template use, because I don't use them. But in terms of what to include, this is what I write:
See this section of CITE for more information. Hope this helps a little. SlimVirgin talk| contribs 01:14, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
Some comments: pretty good! Fifelfoo ( talk) 03:31, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Beloved Freak 16:18, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
I've found some issues to be addressed. I also have some suggestions that are either unrelated to the GA criteria or are just my opinion, so I'll list those separately and you can do with them what you choose!
Lead
Origins and Recording
Musical style
Release
Critical reception
References
I see you've also received some advice about citations on the article talkpage, so those are worth bearing in mind for FAC, and good practise, although not all of it is directly applicable to the GA criteria
Lead
Origins and Recording
Musical style
Lyrical themes
Critical reception
Personnel
References
External links
Categories
I'll put the article on hold for now so that you can address any issues, and I'll add anything else that I notice in the meantime. Good work so far, I enjoyed reading it, and it's nice to see a music article that's a bit out of the ordinary! It's also inspired me to check out some more of their music! Let me know if you have any questions or disagree with any of my requests.-- Beloved Freak 18:09, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for putting the work in, I'll list the article as a GA now. I appreciate you explaining each of those sources to me, and I'm happy with them all now. The only thing I can see outstanding is the issue of better attribution in the "Musical style" section. On second thoughts, having another look, I don't think this should hold it back from GA. I still think it's important, but it doesn't affect WP:V and isn't a problem with regard to WP:WIAGA. So, well done! -- Beloved Freak 21:42, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
I completed the copy edit. There wasn't very much to do; some punctuation, a few instances of rephrasing. I do notice that a few chunks of the article are repeated word-for-word in the lead; is this intentional? Also, it looks like the references don't have a consistent date format. Depending on whether WP:STRONGNAT or WP:DATERET applies, all references should use either day-month-year or ISO-format dates consistently. // ⌘macwhiz ( talk) 18:54, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Mwng. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 22:43, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Mwng. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:20, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mwng. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:34, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Mwng has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Mwng article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
ysbeidiau heulog is on songbook (at least the uk edition), so the bit about no songs being on songbook is wrong- and entirely appropriate, since it was the only single from mwng
The translation of Mwng is given as Mane, which is a disambig page. I assume that it means the mane of a Lion and not the mane of a horse, but I don't speak Welsh. If it does, indeed, refer to that of a Lion, it could point to Lion#Hair_.26_mane. I guess if it's really the same as the English "Mane", then it's entirely ambiguous and should point where it already does... Oh well. It was a thought anyway. — gogobera ( talk) 22:46, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Cavie, I saw your query about citation styles on FAC talk. I can't advise about template use, because I don't use them. But in terms of what to include, this is what I write:
See this section of CITE for more information. Hope this helps a little. SlimVirgin talk| contribs 01:14, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
Some comments: pretty good! Fifelfoo ( talk) 03:31, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Beloved Freak 16:18, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
I've found some issues to be addressed. I also have some suggestions that are either unrelated to the GA criteria or are just my opinion, so I'll list those separately and you can do with them what you choose!
Lead
Origins and Recording
Musical style
Release
Critical reception
References
I see you've also received some advice about citations on the article talkpage, so those are worth bearing in mind for FAC, and good practise, although not all of it is directly applicable to the GA criteria
Lead
Origins and Recording
Musical style
Lyrical themes
Critical reception
Personnel
References
External links
Categories
I'll put the article on hold for now so that you can address any issues, and I'll add anything else that I notice in the meantime. Good work so far, I enjoyed reading it, and it's nice to see a music article that's a bit out of the ordinary! It's also inspired me to check out some more of their music! Let me know if you have any questions or disagree with any of my requests.-- Beloved Freak 18:09, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for putting the work in, I'll list the article as a GA now. I appreciate you explaining each of those sources to me, and I'm happy with them all now. The only thing I can see outstanding is the issue of better attribution in the "Musical style" section. On second thoughts, having another look, I don't think this should hold it back from GA. I still think it's important, but it doesn't affect WP:V and isn't a problem with regard to WP:WIAGA. So, well done! -- Beloved Freak 21:42, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
I completed the copy edit. There wasn't very much to do; some punctuation, a few instances of rephrasing. I do notice that a few chunks of the article are repeated word-for-word in the lead; is this intentional? Also, it looks like the references don't have a consistent date format. Depending on whether WP:STRONGNAT or WP:DATERET applies, all references should use either day-month-year or ISO-format dates consistently. // ⌘macwhiz ( talk) 18:54, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Mwng. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 22:43, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Mwng. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:20, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mwng. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:34, 9 February 2018 (UTC)