From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Appear to be about duplicated topics LT910001 ( talk) 13:07, 21 February 2014 (UTC) reply

Definitely. Honestly, this page is just crap, though - it's a single sentence, giving a definition that only works for some muscles, and the other page is the correct term that's used in muscle physiology. You could easily just turn this into a redirect and be done with it. HCA ( talk) 15:00, 21 February 2014 (UTC) reply
Thanks for your comment, HCA. I wasn't aware of that. I have made the merge. -- LT910001 ( talk) 05:40, 22 February 2014 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Appear to be about duplicated topics LT910001 ( talk) 13:07, 21 February 2014 (UTC) reply

Definitely. Honestly, this page is just crap, though - it's a single sentence, giving a definition that only works for some muscles, and the other page is the correct term that's used in muscle physiology. You could easily just turn this into a redirect and be done with it. HCA ( talk) 15:00, 21 February 2014 (UTC) reply
Thanks for your comment, HCA. I wasn't aware of that. I have made the merge. -- LT910001 ( talk) 05:40, 22 February 2014 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook