![]() | Muscina received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article was the subject of an educational assignment that ended on early 2009. Further details are available here. |
The section Muscina#Myiasis of this article is the same subject as the article Myiasis. Those parts should be merge. As it is, there are two separate articles where the subject of Myiasis is discussed at length. — Mattisse ( Talk) 21:34, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
- That's a very good idea! I'm not sure how to merge the material, but I will just copy and paste the Myiasis section of my article with the main Myiasis page. I have to keep all the information in my article, as this article is a school project and simply linking to the Myiasis main page for information probably won't get me an A. -- Hieu87 ( talk) 21:42, 31 March 2009 (UTC)Hieu87
-Thanks for your review. I've fix many of the problems that you mentioned. -- Hieu87 ( talk) 21:55, 31 March 2009 (UTC)Hieu87
So as I was reading your page, I noticed that the section entitled "medical importance" was very choppy and had room to be cleared up. Maybe think about combining a few sentences so that there is a better flow to the page instead of just a constant reoccurrence of periods and endings of sentences. I really enjoyed the information in your article and was impressed with the amount of information you were able to find on the subject. The last comment that I felt I could make was about your "species" box. I felt that it was good to have a list of the species in this family, but I felt that having it in the side box and it going almost the length of the page was somewhat distracting. Possibly move the species into the bulk of the paper or maybe see if you can clean it up and make it more concise so that it does not distract from the rest of the page. Good job! Nav52 ( talk) 14:53, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Wow, your page is fantastic. It is easy to tell you spent a great deal of time on it. The only suggestion I can think to make is breaking up your long paragraphs with bullets, or starred points or incorporating pictures into the text. Most people gloss over a page to see if the point of information they are looking for is on the page. Catielynn.russell ( talk) 00:57, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Hey guys, your page looks great. I can tell you put a lot of work into the research, your page is very informative. I really liked you section on myiasis, the individual cases were a nice touch. A few thing about it though, for Cutaneous myiasis you may want to put what exactly that kind of myiasis that is because it was a little confusing. Also you may want to think about rearranging the paragraphs so myiasis is with medical importance because it seems like the two are closely related. Otherwise the page looks really good, Great job guys. Smurph7282 ( talk) 17:22, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
Thank you Nav52, Catielynn.russell and Smurph7282 for your suggestions! Nav52, we've edited the sentences in the medical importance section and it should flow more smoothly.
To answer your comments, Catielyn.russell, i would like to first off say that you have some pretty good points. but, while we understand that putting bullet points will definitely help summarize the information in our paragraph, it is also quite a monumental task and seeing that our project is due in 24 hours, I'm afraid we won't be able to fix this problem at this point in time. I'm not really sure what you mean when you say to incorporate pictures into the text. We have several pictures scattered throughout our article.
Okay now to answer your comments Smurph7828. First off, I'm not really sure what you're trying to say about the myiasis, b/c cutaneous myiasis is myiasis of the skin (cutaneous). I can't really get anymore specific than that. We broke up the myiasis section into cutaneous, intestinal, and sheep. The reason we didn't put Myiasis with Medical Importance was because we found a lot of good information on the Myiasis topic alone and felt it wouldn't do it justice to put it under the medical section.
Thanks to all who contributed to this article. Charms18 ( talk) 22:45, 15 April 2009 (UTC) Charms18 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Charms18 ( talk • contribs) 22:41, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Muscina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:33, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
![]() | Muscina received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article was the subject of an educational assignment that ended on early 2009. Further details are available here. |
The section Muscina#Myiasis of this article is the same subject as the article Myiasis. Those parts should be merge. As it is, there are two separate articles where the subject of Myiasis is discussed at length. — Mattisse ( Talk) 21:34, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
- That's a very good idea! I'm not sure how to merge the material, but I will just copy and paste the Myiasis section of my article with the main Myiasis page. I have to keep all the information in my article, as this article is a school project and simply linking to the Myiasis main page for information probably won't get me an A. -- Hieu87 ( talk) 21:42, 31 March 2009 (UTC)Hieu87
-Thanks for your review. I've fix many of the problems that you mentioned. -- Hieu87 ( talk) 21:55, 31 March 2009 (UTC)Hieu87
So as I was reading your page, I noticed that the section entitled "medical importance" was very choppy and had room to be cleared up. Maybe think about combining a few sentences so that there is a better flow to the page instead of just a constant reoccurrence of periods and endings of sentences. I really enjoyed the information in your article and was impressed with the amount of information you were able to find on the subject. The last comment that I felt I could make was about your "species" box. I felt that it was good to have a list of the species in this family, but I felt that having it in the side box and it going almost the length of the page was somewhat distracting. Possibly move the species into the bulk of the paper or maybe see if you can clean it up and make it more concise so that it does not distract from the rest of the page. Good job! Nav52 ( talk) 14:53, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Wow, your page is fantastic. It is easy to tell you spent a great deal of time on it. The only suggestion I can think to make is breaking up your long paragraphs with bullets, or starred points or incorporating pictures into the text. Most people gloss over a page to see if the point of information they are looking for is on the page. Catielynn.russell ( talk) 00:57, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Hey guys, your page looks great. I can tell you put a lot of work into the research, your page is very informative. I really liked you section on myiasis, the individual cases were a nice touch. A few thing about it though, for Cutaneous myiasis you may want to put what exactly that kind of myiasis that is because it was a little confusing. Also you may want to think about rearranging the paragraphs so myiasis is with medical importance because it seems like the two are closely related. Otherwise the page looks really good, Great job guys. Smurph7282 ( talk) 17:22, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
Thank you Nav52, Catielynn.russell and Smurph7282 for your suggestions! Nav52, we've edited the sentences in the medical importance section and it should flow more smoothly.
To answer your comments, Catielyn.russell, i would like to first off say that you have some pretty good points. but, while we understand that putting bullet points will definitely help summarize the information in our paragraph, it is also quite a monumental task and seeing that our project is due in 24 hours, I'm afraid we won't be able to fix this problem at this point in time. I'm not really sure what you mean when you say to incorporate pictures into the text. We have several pictures scattered throughout our article.
Okay now to answer your comments Smurph7828. First off, I'm not really sure what you're trying to say about the myiasis, b/c cutaneous myiasis is myiasis of the skin (cutaneous). I can't really get anymore specific than that. We broke up the myiasis section into cutaneous, intestinal, and sheep. The reason we didn't put Myiasis with Medical Importance was because we found a lot of good information on the Myiasis topic alone and felt it wouldn't do it justice to put it under the medical section.
Thanks to all who contributed to this article. Charms18 ( talk) 22:45, 15 April 2009 (UTC) Charms18 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Charms18 ( talk • contribs) 22:41, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Muscina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:33, 8 February 2018 (UTC)