This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Murderdolls article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Why do people get so much wrong about this band? Oh well, atleast it gives me something to do in my otherwise un-eventful little life!
~ Doktor Wilhelm 15:12, 05 Sep 2006
Should it be noted here that the themes portayed in the music are satire, or just general jokes? Some people seem to believe it's real, and judge them as necrophiliacs, among other things.
I agree, most of the lyrics are said with definate comedic intentions which really does not come across in the article- its kind of missing the point.
This band is a joke. Ahem'-- Matt von Furrie 09:19, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
There are so many people that know such little about a band but seem to think of them selves as knowing everything (this counts for every single band ever)! Most of the entry for the Murderdolls on here was slightly wrong (though I fear I may have only bastardised it farther with my 'contribution')*sighs*
~ Doktor Wilhelm 13:56, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
I am unsure if their song "Love At First Fright" was a single or just a song on their album. Could someone please clear this up for me???
Catherine Catalyst
XxNo.One.RunsxX
14:35, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
Supposedly in Japan only, there is however a video for it. (a compilation of clips from live shows and backstage) - Deathrocker 05:41, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks. I haven't seen the video for it, I just noticed it was on another website as a single.
Catherine Catalyst
XxNo.One.RunsxX
14:52, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
someone's made this page all snazzy... well done...
Doktor Wilhelm 23:28, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Someone added a murderdolls myspace page, it's not offical, they don't even have one. Wednesday 13 does tohugh, along with one for FDQ13 and for his solo efforts.
Whoever listed the Murderdolls Genre as
nu-metal must be having a laugh?
I really think they should look nu-matal up on here!!! . o O (How much else must be wrong on
Wikipedia?)
Doktor Wilhelm
03:26, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
Image:BeyondMurderdolls.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 19:03, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Come on, no band should have the million genres that the Murderdolls had in their infobox. I've cut it down to Horror Punk and Heavy Metal as this sums up their style and their level of heaviness. They aren't Hard Rock, that means proper rock like AC/DC and Led Zep. Glam metal, yeah but that's more an influence than their actual genre. And why does Horror Punk keep getting moved down to last place on the list? Because they only have horror influence? Let's face it, there are so few Horror Punk bands that any could represent the genre. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.110.29.160 ( talk) 15:54, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
Punk, Hard Rock Shock Rock and musically elements taken Actual as Riff Metal bands typical of Alternative and Nu Metal Metal tailored style and Shock Horror Punk Rock, his last work sounds more focused on keeping the groove metal band influences as Alice Cooper, Mottley Clue and Misfits to name a few.-- Staybrutal666 ( talk) 23:19, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
I'm removing the bit about the tracklisting as it takes up lots of space and, to be honest if people want to know it they should check the albums page. Thanks. - Ottsworth ( talk) 16:10, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
174.29.145.144 removed several of topics mentioned as being in Murderdolls lyrics from the article, stating: "The three removed topics they supposedly cover are rubbish and have no recognition in any of the bands lyrics", But they do cover these topics:
Doktor Wilhelm 07:47, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
By 212.121.200.204, No reason was given; also song names that may be viewed as offencive were removed from the article by the same user; Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_censored Doktor Wilhelm 21:37, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
I feel like some associated acts are missing from the right hand box. I would suggest FDQ From Planet 13, Bourbon Crow and even the Wednesday 13 page (as it counts as a band, even if it's a solo act) be added. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.169.6.27 ( talk) 03:40, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Murderdolls. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:30, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Murderdolls. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www2.kerrang.com/2010/03/exclusive_murderdolls_are_back.html{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=142439When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:04, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Murderdolls article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Why do people get so much wrong about this band? Oh well, atleast it gives me something to do in my otherwise un-eventful little life!
~ Doktor Wilhelm 15:12, 05 Sep 2006
Should it be noted here that the themes portayed in the music are satire, or just general jokes? Some people seem to believe it's real, and judge them as necrophiliacs, among other things.
I agree, most of the lyrics are said with definate comedic intentions which really does not come across in the article- its kind of missing the point.
This band is a joke. Ahem'-- Matt von Furrie 09:19, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
There are so many people that know such little about a band but seem to think of them selves as knowing everything (this counts for every single band ever)! Most of the entry for the Murderdolls on here was slightly wrong (though I fear I may have only bastardised it farther with my 'contribution')*sighs*
~ Doktor Wilhelm 13:56, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
I am unsure if their song "Love At First Fright" was a single or just a song on their album. Could someone please clear this up for me???
Catherine Catalyst
XxNo.One.RunsxX
14:35, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
Supposedly in Japan only, there is however a video for it. (a compilation of clips from live shows and backstage) - Deathrocker 05:41, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks. I haven't seen the video for it, I just noticed it was on another website as a single.
Catherine Catalyst
XxNo.One.RunsxX
14:52, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
someone's made this page all snazzy... well done...
Doktor Wilhelm 23:28, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Someone added a murderdolls myspace page, it's not offical, they don't even have one. Wednesday 13 does tohugh, along with one for FDQ13 and for his solo efforts.
Whoever listed the Murderdolls Genre as
nu-metal must be having a laugh?
I really think they should look nu-matal up on here!!! . o O (How much else must be wrong on
Wikipedia?)
Doktor Wilhelm
03:26, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
Image:BeyondMurderdolls.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 19:03, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Come on, no band should have the million genres that the Murderdolls had in their infobox. I've cut it down to Horror Punk and Heavy Metal as this sums up their style and their level of heaviness. They aren't Hard Rock, that means proper rock like AC/DC and Led Zep. Glam metal, yeah but that's more an influence than their actual genre. And why does Horror Punk keep getting moved down to last place on the list? Because they only have horror influence? Let's face it, there are so few Horror Punk bands that any could represent the genre. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.110.29.160 ( talk) 15:54, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
Punk, Hard Rock Shock Rock and musically elements taken Actual as Riff Metal bands typical of Alternative and Nu Metal Metal tailored style and Shock Horror Punk Rock, his last work sounds more focused on keeping the groove metal band influences as Alice Cooper, Mottley Clue and Misfits to name a few.-- Staybrutal666 ( talk) 23:19, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
I'm removing the bit about the tracklisting as it takes up lots of space and, to be honest if people want to know it they should check the albums page. Thanks. - Ottsworth ( talk) 16:10, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
174.29.145.144 removed several of topics mentioned as being in Murderdolls lyrics from the article, stating: "The three removed topics they supposedly cover are rubbish and have no recognition in any of the bands lyrics", But they do cover these topics:
Doktor Wilhelm 07:47, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
By 212.121.200.204, No reason was given; also song names that may be viewed as offencive were removed from the article by the same user; Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_censored Doktor Wilhelm 21:37, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
I feel like some associated acts are missing from the right hand box. I would suggest FDQ From Planet 13, Bourbon Crow and even the Wednesday 13 page (as it counts as a band, even if it's a solo act) be added. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.169.6.27 ( talk) 03:40, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Murderdolls. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:30, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Murderdolls. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www2.kerrang.com/2010/03/exclusive_murderdolls_are_back.html{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=142439When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:04, 8 February 2018 (UTC)