Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: – Spaceman Spiff 10:09, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
Comments: I think the article is in pretty good shape overall; I have a few suggestions:
Let me know what you think. cheers. – Spaceman Spiff 04:50, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
Munneswaram pattuva was a older divison of the country no longer used also, I have no idae as to whether these villages are still extant as the whole area economy changed from that of village paddy cultivation to coconut planatation leaving only few villages intact such as Maradankulama and Udappu that are associated with the Temple. Taprobanus ( talk) 21:58, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of February 17, 2010, compares against the six good article criteria:
Generally good articles, could do with a couple more images. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— — Spaceman Spiff 03:00, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: – Spaceman Spiff 10:09, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
Comments: I think the article is in pretty good shape overall; I have a few suggestions:
Let me know what you think. cheers. – Spaceman Spiff 04:50, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
Munneswaram pattuva was a older divison of the country no longer used also, I have no idae as to whether these villages are still extant as the whole area economy changed from that of village paddy cultivation to coconut planatation leaving only few villages intact such as Maradankulama and Udappu that are associated with the Temple. Taprobanus ( talk) 21:58, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of February 17, 2010, compares against the six good article criteria:
Generally good articles, could do with a couple more images. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— — Spaceman Spiff 03:00, 17 February 2010 (UTC)