![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The german Fischer Weltgeschichte, volume 17, on India says that the excavations at Mundigak showed the western extension of the Indus-Valley-Cultures (p.18). Though at the same time closer relations exist to the ancient Iran and perhaps further West. A continued settlement in the Indo-Iranian area from pre-historic times can be assumed due to neolithic findings. It follows from this that Indus-Valley-Cultures and Indo-Iranian cultures are the same, including neolithic and later levels of history. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.115.98.14 ( talk) 22:29, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
The "Encyclopaedia of Indian Archaeology", which is cited three times in the article, states in its 70th page:
My question being, is there enough evidence to claim that "Mundigak is recognized as a large prehistoric town belonging to transitional phase of Harappan development"?-- Negrulio ( talk) 00:54, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Mundigak. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 09:38, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
Links are fine. Y-barton ( talk) 17:44, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The german Fischer Weltgeschichte, volume 17, on India says that the excavations at Mundigak showed the western extension of the Indus-Valley-Cultures (p.18). Though at the same time closer relations exist to the ancient Iran and perhaps further West. A continued settlement in the Indo-Iranian area from pre-historic times can be assumed due to neolithic findings. It follows from this that Indus-Valley-Cultures and Indo-Iranian cultures are the same, including neolithic and later levels of history. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.115.98.14 ( talk) 22:29, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
The "Encyclopaedia of Indian Archaeology", which is cited three times in the article, states in its 70th page:
My question being, is there enough evidence to claim that "Mundigak is recognized as a large prehistoric town belonging to transitional phase of Harappan development"?-- Negrulio ( talk) 00:54, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Mundigak. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 09:38, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
Links are fine. Y-barton ( talk) 17:44, 23 April 2016 (UTC)