This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is really bad and most of the information in it is wrong. I am going to try to completely rewrite it.-- 67.164.139.172 ( talk) 19:47, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
Here's another good reference for the present article.
Keahapana ( talk) 23:14, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
St.nerol, you've added a "lead section may be too long" maintenance template to the article, can you explain your rationale behind it? The lead currently has about 225 words, the whole article about 2000 – so it's 11% of the total, which hardly seems too much. Originally the lead was formatted as a single paragraph, and for that it was too long, I agree with that. However, I have now split it into three paragraphs, and I think it's fine now. Do you agree, or do you still find it "too long"? Gawaon ( talk) 11:47, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is really bad and most of the information in it is wrong. I am going to try to completely rewrite it.-- 67.164.139.172 ( talk) 19:47, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
Here's another good reference for the present article.
Keahapana ( talk) 23:14, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
St.nerol, you've added a "lead section may be too long" maintenance template to the article, can you explain your rationale behind it? The lead currently has about 225 words, the whole article about 2000 – so it's 11% of the total, which hardly seems too much. Originally the lead was formatted as a single paragraph, and for that it was too long, I agree with that. However, I have now split it into three paragraphs, and I think it's fine now. Do you agree, or do you still find it "too long"? Gawaon ( talk) 11:47, 29 October 2023 (UTC)