![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that a logo be
included in this article to
improve its quality. For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images. The Free Image Search Tool may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: here, here, here, here, here, and here. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Diannaa ( talk) 00:54, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
the last sentence of subsection “ History”, to make it more idiomatic, at least to a native English speaker, such as I am. Okay?-- Solomonfromfinland ( talk) 20:33, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Removal of the Cost section should be considered. This project has started very recently. What's listed are estimates. Estimated costs are not facts. An encyclopedia entry needs to stick with facts only. Fatnred 21:46, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 15:22, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
I undid an edit which changed track gauge from standard to broad gauge without citing any sources.
The page High-speed rail in India states that the track gauge for all the new dedicated high speed lines is standard gauge, and I found one source which states the same. I haven't added the source as I am unsure if it is of sufficient quality or reputability for Wikipedia's standards.
standard gauge source: https://metrorailtoday.com/article/mumbai-ahmedabad-high-speed-rail-project-information-routes-fares-and-other-details
edit I undid: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Mumbai%E2%80%93Ahmedabad_high-speed_rail_corridor&diff=1154178154&oldid=1153648294
If any of this is in error, feel free to revert my changes.
122.58.104.98 ( talk) 03:09, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Not moved ( closed by non-admin page mover) * Pppery * it has begun... 14:28, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Mumbai–Ahmedabad high-speed rail corridor → India Bullet Train Project – The common name of the project is "Bullet Train Project". [1] We should rename it because present name isn't common name, no one call it by this lengthy name. Tesla car owner ( talk) 05:53, 3 July 2023 (UTC) Tesla car owner ( talk) 05:53, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
References
"The National High-Speed Rail Corporation Limited (NHSRCL) has successfully erected the first steel bridge, measuring 70 meters in length, over National Highway-53 in Surat in Gujarat, for the Mumbai-Ahmedabad High-Speed Rail Corridor.
This bridge is the first among the 28 steel bridges planned for the MAHSR corridor."
I think these two sentences were supposed to be a part of the project status timeline, but for some reason it didn't get moved into the correct spot on the bulleted list, possibly because the author didn't know how to properly do the formatting to do this. Since it doesn't have a source and doesn't mention any kind of date, I am not sure where to move those two sentences. In my opinion, it doesn't really make sense to have these two sentences be separate from the bulleted timeline, as this is a specific timeline event that has a specific date, which would then become outdated as more and more bridges get built. I'm thinking of 4 different options for what can be done with those two sentences:
What do you all think about this? Anonymous Libertarian ( talk) 15:22, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The word "yen" and the term "Japanese yen" is mentioned 6 times in this article (at the time of me writing this): 3 instances are capitalized and 3 instances are lowercase. This creates inconsistency, so I went to Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Capital letters, but I didn't see anything on the capitalization of currencies. After that, I looked at the Wikipedia page for Japanese yen, and saw that all instances of the term "Japanese yen" in that article had "yen" in lowercase, so I went ahead and made all instances of the word "yen" in this article lowercase as well. Anonymous Libertarian ( talk) 15:05, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
I read through the article and there's not a single mention of anything going wrong with this project, at least as far as I can tell. Construction projects always have problems. Has it just not been reported on or has it been getting removed from the article? Ergzay ( talk) 18:59, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
The "Project Status" section is excessively detailed and poorly sourced. Would it be worth shortening this section? The previous years could perhaps be summarised into a short paragraph each. 114.23.161.152 ( talk) 02:40, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
The whole section regarding the Launching Gantries seems to be written by or for the company that built them. It reads like a really long advertisement for the specific company, is not factual, has - in most part - little relevance to the article and its proportions are way to intense in contrast to the article as a whole. A few examples:
"The collaboration between NRS Bridge Construction India Pvt. Ltd. and leading contractors like Larsen and Toubro, as well as Dineshchandra R. Agrawal Infracon Private Limited, stands as a testament to the commitment to excellence in the field of bridge construction. The successful delivery of these packages underscores the technical prowess and dedication of NRS AS India [...]"
"NRS Bridge Construction India Pvt. Ltd., a distinguished subsidiary of NRS AS in India, has played a pivotal role in the success of the ambitious Mumbai-Ahmedabad High-Speed Rail (MAHSR) project. Specializing in the design and fabrication of launching gantries (LG) for Segmental Bridges, NRS has been a key contributor to several MAHSR packages, collaborating seamlessly with renowned contractors."
This clearly has no business being in a wikipedia-article, right? YannickBln ( talk) 05:08, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that a logo be
included in this article to
improve its quality. For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images. The Free Image Search Tool may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: here, here, here, here, here, and here. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Diannaa ( talk) 00:54, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
the last sentence of subsection “ History”, to make it more idiomatic, at least to a native English speaker, such as I am. Okay?-- Solomonfromfinland ( talk) 20:33, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Removal of the Cost section should be considered. This project has started very recently. What's listed are estimates. Estimated costs are not facts. An encyclopedia entry needs to stick with facts only. Fatnred 21:46, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 15:22, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
I undid an edit which changed track gauge from standard to broad gauge without citing any sources.
The page High-speed rail in India states that the track gauge for all the new dedicated high speed lines is standard gauge, and I found one source which states the same. I haven't added the source as I am unsure if it is of sufficient quality or reputability for Wikipedia's standards.
standard gauge source: https://metrorailtoday.com/article/mumbai-ahmedabad-high-speed-rail-project-information-routes-fares-and-other-details
edit I undid: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Mumbai%E2%80%93Ahmedabad_high-speed_rail_corridor&diff=1154178154&oldid=1153648294
If any of this is in error, feel free to revert my changes.
122.58.104.98 ( talk) 03:09, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Not moved ( closed by non-admin page mover) * Pppery * it has begun... 14:28, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Mumbai–Ahmedabad high-speed rail corridor → India Bullet Train Project – The common name of the project is "Bullet Train Project". [1] We should rename it because present name isn't common name, no one call it by this lengthy name. Tesla car owner ( talk) 05:53, 3 July 2023 (UTC) Tesla car owner ( talk) 05:53, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
References
"The National High-Speed Rail Corporation Limited (NHSRCL) has successfully erected the first steel bridge, measuring 70 meters in length, over National Highway-53 in Surat in Gujarat, for the Mumbai-Ahmedabad High-Speed Rail Corridor.
This bridge is the first among the 28 steel bridges planned for the MAHSR corridor."
I think these two sentences were supposed to be a part of the project status timeline, but for some reason it didn't get moved into the correct spot on the bulleted list, possibly because the author didn't know how to properly do the formatting to do this. Since it doesn't have a source and doesn't mention any kind of date, I am not sure where to move those two sentences. In my opinion, it doesn't really make sense to have these two sentences be separate from the bulleted timeline, as this is a specific timeline event that has a specific date, which would then become outdated as more and more bridges get built. I'm thinking of 4 different options for what can be done with those two sentences:
What do you all think about this? Anonymous Libertarian ( talk) 15:22, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The word "yen" and the term "Japanese yen" is mentioned 6 times in this article (at the time of me writing this): 3 instances are capitalized and 3 instances are lowercase. This creates inconsistency, so I went to Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Capital letters, but I didn't see anything on the capitalization of currencies. After that, I looked at the Wikipedia page for Japanese yen, and saw that all instances of the term "Japanese yen" in that article had "yen" in lowercase, so I went ahead and made all instances of the word "yen" in this article lowercase as well. Anonymous Libertarian ( talk) 15:05, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
I read through the article and there's not a single mention of anything going wrong with this project, at least as far as I can tell. Construction projects always have problems. Has it just not been reported on or has it been getting removed from the article? Ergzay ( talk) 18:59, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
The "Project Status" section is excessively detailed and poorly sourced. Would it be worth shortening this section? The previous years could perhaps be summarised into a short paragraph each. 114.23.161.152 ( talk) 02:40, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
The whole section regarding the Launching Gantries seems to be written by or for the company that built them. It reads like a really long advertisement for the specific company, is not factual, has - in most part - little relevance to the article and its proportions are way to intense in contrast to the article as a whole. A few examples:
"The collaboration between NRS Bridge Construction India Pvt. Ltd. and leading contractors like Larsen and Toubro, as well as Dineshchandra R. Agrawal Infracon Private Limited, stands as a testament to the commitment to excellence in the field of bridge construction. The successful delivery of these packages underscores the technical prowess and dedication of NRS AS India [...]"
"NRS Bridge Construction India Pvt. Ltd., a distinguished subsidiary of NRS AS in India, has played a pivotal role in the success of the ambitious Mumbai-Ahmedabad High-Speed Rail (MAHSR) project. Specializing in the design and fabrication of launching gantries (LG) for Segmental Bridges, NRS has been a key contributor to several MAHSR packages, collaborating seamlessly with renowned contractors."
This clearly has no business being in a wikipedia-article, right? YannickBln ( talk) 05:08, 7 March 2024 (UTC)