![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
The topics are one and the same (anon)
I have carried out the merger and left a Redirect at Multipactor. Lumos3 17:09, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
A resonance is important only in two-surface multipactor, but not in single-surface multipactor. So to make this article general, I think that the resonance should not be mentioned in definition. That is why I described two kinds of multipactor in the mechanism section. -- Mindgame123 20:10, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
A single surface multipactor can occur on a metal surface when a static magnetic field is present. This article seems to imply that only a dielectric surface can sustain a multipacting event, which is simply not true. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.114.26.28 ( talk) 14:27, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Thanks for your time! Stephen Murray at CST ( talk) 13:05, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
I've implemented this image, but there are two citation parameters which ought to be activated.
|page=
and |quote=
parameters. Please enter the page number or |pages=
for the page range that the source resides upon, as well as the verbatim text from the source which confirms the operation of the coaxial multipactor as illustrated. Most notably, the illustration in the reference shows all secondary electrons concentrated at two electric field nodes, whereas your illustration only indicates one node. Please advise.When ready to proceed with the requested information, please alter the {{
Request edit}}
template's answer parameter to read from |ans=yes
to |ans=no
and enter the information into the reference template which you've added to this talk page. Thank you!
Regards,
Spintendo
22:50, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
The topics are one and the same (anon)
I have carried out the merger and left a Redirect at Multipactor. Lumos3 17:09, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
A resonance is important only in two-surface multipactor, but not in single-surface multipactor. So to make this article general, I think that the resonance should not be mentioned in definition. That is why I described two kinds of multipactor in the mechanism section. -- Mindgame123 20:10, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
A single surface multipactor can occur on a metal surface when a static magnetic field is present. This article seems to imply that only a dielectric surface can sustain a multipacting event, which is simply not true. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.114.26.28 ( talk) 14:27, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Thanks for your time! Stephen Murray at CST ( talk) 13:05, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
I've implemented this image, but there are two citation parameters which ought to be activated.
|page=
and |quote=
parameters. Please enter the page number or |pages=
for the page range that the source resides upon, as well as the verbatim text from the source which confirms the operation of the coaxial multipactor as illustrated. Most notably, the illustration in the reference shows all secondary electrons concentrated at two electric field nodes, whereas your illustration only indicates one node. Please advise.When ready to proceed with the requested information, please alter the {{
Request edit}}
template's answer parameter to read from |ans=yes
to |ans=no
and enter the information into the reference template which you've added to this talk page. Thank you!
Regards,
Spintendo
22:50, 23 October 2018 (UTC)