This article was nominated for deletion on September 16, 2005. The result of the discussion was delete. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Note that an earlier version of this article was deleted by Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Multimachine. However, the entire content of that version was:
“ | An inexpensive multi-purpose home-made machine that is built around engine blocks. most multimachines consist of 2 engine blocks,some pipe,import bearings, an import cross-feed table, a motor and scissors jacks.It can drill in 3 different ways, horizontal mill, chop-saw and surface grind and much more.Designed and marketed by Pat Delany at http://this.was.a.spam.link/ and perfected by the constant inflow of ideas at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/this.was.also.a.spam.link | ” |
So I am not going to delete this new version immediately.
But it needs considerable improvement. The main thing is "third party" references, ie. has any news medium commented on this project? How many of these machines have actually been produced? Is this article just spam for a Yahoo group? -- RHaworth 07:08, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Nils Davis 18:13, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
Unfortunately, it seems "multimachine" is a very common keyword. Let this be a lesson to anybody who comes up with a product name...
I've dug in all the sources to which I have access and have found nothing. But that may be because of filtering out bad results. Also, considering that ref is actually just a blog post, I'm wondering just how notable this really is. I won't contest that it's cool but its notability is very questionable. —/ Mendaliv/ 2¢/ Δ's/ 09:53, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
There's a difference between "accuracy" or "precision". Discuss?
Wikkrockiana ( talk) 20:31, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
"Information used by permission of Pat Delaney, the founder of the multimachine project." <- This was originally at the bottom of the article. Wizard191 ( talk) 17:36, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
This article was nominated for deletion on September 16, 2005. The result of the discussion was delete. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Note that an earlier version of this article was deleted by Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Multimachine. However, the entire content of that version was:
“ | An inexpensive multi-purpose home-made machine that is built around engine blocks. most multimachines consist of 2 engine blocks,some pipe,import bearings, an import cross-feed table, a motor and scissors jacks.It can drill in 3 different ways, horizontal mill, chop-saw and surface grind and much more.Designed and marketed by Pat Delany at http://this.was.a.spam.link/ and perfected by the constant inflow of ideas at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/this.was.also.a.spam.link | ” |
So I am not going to delete this new version immediately.
But it needs considerable improvement. The main thing is "third party" references, ie. has any news medium commented on this project? How many of these machines have actually been produced? Is this article just spam for a Yahoo group? -- RHaworth 07:08, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Nils Davis 18:13, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
Unfortunately, it seems "multimachine" is a very common keyword. Let this be a lesson to anybody who comes up with a product name...
I've dug in all the sources to which I have access and have found nothing. But that may be because of filtering out bad results. Also, considering that ref is actually just a blog post, I'm wondering just how notable this really is. I won't contest that it's cool but its notability is very questionable. —/ Mendaliv/ 2¢/ Δ's/ 09:53, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
There's a difference between "accuracy" or "precision". Discuss?
Wikkrockiana ( talk) 20:31, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
"Information used by permission of Pat Delaney, the founder of the multimachine project." <- This was originally at the bottom of the article. Wizard191 ( talk) 17:36, 4 February 2010 (UTC)