This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Robotics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Robotics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RoboticsWikipedia:WikiProject RoboticsTemplate:WikiProject RoboticsRobotics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article has been marked as needing immediate attention. Mathematics Low‑priority This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale. Statistics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

• Refs - tidyup: remove the list of crap from the bottom and turn into reading list.
  • Add inline cites
• Bring up to date
• Check for accuracy
• Lead - cleanup

Chaosdruid ( talk) 03:29, 8 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Should the phrase "constructive induction" be in italics, since you are introducing a new term? Similarly, other key phrases should be defined before they are used.

pfinder —Preceding undated comment added 10:22, 8 January 2011 (UTC). reply