This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Roots music Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Roots music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to roots, folk and traditional folk music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Roots musicWikipedia:WikiProject Roots musicTemplate:WikiProject Roots musicRoots music articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. United Kingdom This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article is still under construction (July 2008). I'll update as soon as I can. Hohenloh ( talk) 10:58, 29 July 2008 (UTC) reply

After a vandalism attack on 3 August I reverted to a previous version. I tried to include all all edits made during the vandalism attack--apologies if I missed anything. Hohenloh ( talk) 20:10, 4 August 2008 (UTC) reply

The link from American Folk Music in the article is to a section of American Music. Would it be better linking directly to American Folk Music (which isn't a great article) or leaving it where it is? Hohenloh ( talk) 22:58, 14 August 2008 (UTC) reply

I linked thus for American & British folk, considering these links more useful because:

• Music...#Folk contained a prominent link to the ...Folk Music article,
• the Folk stand-alone article was no better, and
• links from the Folk back to the national music articles did not seem inviting.

-- Egmonster ( talk) 20:22, 15 August 2008 (UTC) reply