GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will ( talk · contribs) 14:40, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
The introduction looks good; it makes for a nice shorter version of the article for those without time to read about the topic in full. (Inserted after) I can say the same for the "History" section; all MOS guidlines appear to be followed here. (Inserted after) Similarly, I see no issues with the writing in "Mu waves and mirror neurons", or its subsection "Mirror neurons and autism". (Inserted after) I do not see any such problems in "Development" or its subsection "Development in individuals with autism", either. (Inserted after) The final content section, "Brain-computer interfaces", also has good prose, without any grammatical issues.
Like my singing? Ha-la-la-la-la-la-LA-LAAA!!! (
talk)
11:30, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
Nothing in the content appears to have been "left to chance", so to speak; all sections are diversely and frequently cited, the references are all reputable published sources, and a well-arranged list of references is included at the end of the article.
Like my singing? Ha-la-la-la-la-la-LA-LAAA!!! (
talk)
12:12, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
After having read through the article, I feel that it does cover all necessary aspects of the topic for which reliable information is available. I saw no "trivia" or irrelevant information inserted anywhere in the content, nor did I see any excess detail-issues of any other sort.
Like my singing? Ha-la-la-la-la-la-LA-LAAA!!! (
talk)
12:14, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
The article's content is neutral, not giving weight or implication to any promotion or demotion of any aspect of the topic.
Like my singing? Ha-la-la-la-la-la-LA-LAAA!!! (
talk)
12:16, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
The article has not, prior to this review, been edited in nearly a month, and none of the most recent edits appear to have been any kind of revert, including edit warring.
Like my singing? Ha-la-la-la-la-la-LA-LAAA!!! (
talk)
11:20, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
The two images in this article are from the Wikimedia Commons, with valid licences, so there is no fair-use issue in this article. Both images provide relevant visual information and illustration to the article and are well-captioned.
Like my singing? Ha-la-la-la-la-la-LA-LAAA!!! (
talk)
11:17, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
After reading the article thoroughly, and checking over all aspects of the article in correlation to GA criteria, I'm satisfied that the article meets the criteria, even excelling at some, and is more than ready to be included amongst other "Biology and medicine" GAs. Congratulations!
Like my singing? Ha-la-la-la-la-la-LA-LAAA!!! (
talk)
12:18, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will ( talk · contribs) 14:40, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
The introduction looks good; it makes for a nice shorter version of the article for those without time to read about the topic in full. (Inserted after) I can say the same for the "History" section; all MOS guidlines appear to be followed here. (Inserted after) Similarly, I see no issues with the writing in "Mu waves and mirror neurons", or its subsection "Mirror neurons and autism". (Inserted after) I do not see any such problems in "Development" or its subsection "Development in individuals with autism", either. (Inserted after) The final content section, "Brain-computer interfaces", also has good prose, without any grammatical issues.
Like my singing? Ha-la-la-la-la-la-LA-LAAA!!! (
talk)
11:30, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
Nothing in the content appears to have been "left to chance", so to speak; all sections are diversely and frequently cited, the references are all reputable published sources, and a well-arranged list of references is included at the end of the article.
Like my singing? Ha-la-la-la-la-la-LA-LAAA!!! (
talk)
12:12, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
After having read through the article, I feel that it does cover all necessary aspects of the topic for which reliable information is available. I saw no "trivia" or irrelevant information inserted anywhere in the content, nor did I see any excess detail-issues of any other sort.
Like my singing? Ha-la-la-la-la-la-LA-LAAA!!! (
talk)
12:14, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
The article's content is neutral, not giving weight or implication to any promotion or demotion of any aspect of the topic.
Like my singing? Ha-la-la-la-la-la-LA-LAAA!!! (
talk)
12:16, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
The article has not, prior to this review, been edited in nearly a month, and none of the most recent edits appear to have been any kind of revert, including edit warring.
Like my singing? Ha-la-la-la-la-la-LA-LAAA!!! (
talk)
11:20, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
The two images in this article are from the Wikimedia Commons, with valid licences, so there is no fair-use issue in this article. Both images provide relevant visual information and illustration to the article and are well-captioned.
Like my singing? Ha-la-la-la-la-la-LA-LAAA!!! (
talk)
11:17, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
After reading the article thoroughly, and checking over all aspects of the article in correlation to GA criteria, I'm satisfied that the article meets the criteria, even excelling at some, and is more than ready to be included amongst other "Biology and medicine" GAs. Congratulations!
Like my singing? Ha-la-la-la-la-la-LA-LAAA!!! (
talk)
12:18, 14 December 2012 (UTC)