This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

India: Maharashtra This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Maharashtra. Architecture This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Military history: Fortifications This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Fortifications task force

I have added a lead sentence and stub tag - can this be preserved now? Thanks Berek ( talk) 05:08, 14 June 2016 (UTC) reply

This article should not be speedy deleted as lacking sufficient context to identify its subject, because... Fine picture, map and infobox. I've added a brief lead sentence and stub tag -- Berek ( talk) 05:12, 14 June 2016 (UTC) reply