![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
I think that in an encyclopedic sense "Mount Eden" should be referring to the volcano more than the suburb; suburbs don't really recieve recognition in an encyclopedia, volcanoes do. Would it be worth making the article about the volcano (not the suburb)? Neonumbers 08:51, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
The result of the debate was don't move. — Nightstallion (?) 10:18, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
Mount Eden → Mount Eden, New Zealand – {reason for move} copied from the entry on the WP:RM page
"one mans meat is another mans poison". dunno, but sometimes I wonder where this is all going. ok so delete stuff and that will make it better. But how about move that content to wwhere it is needed? If you put it in a stubb then it will be suggested to be moved to a common article, and thats where it cam from. perhaps put it in the talk page to assemble it for its ultimate destination. thats too hard for some, deletion is real easy. It may be irrelevant to some, but not to others, the usual plan is to talk about it first, or at least give better reasoning, but I am still trying to understand how thats being bold. deletion is kinda bold, but even boldness could come with some sensitivity. moza 13:19, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
Typical use of the facilty was for Taxi, Trucks and Vans, and any business needing mobile communications back to their office. The scheme was designed as a work around for the topography and small scale business needs of New Zealand, with the then NZPO ( New Zealand Post Office) Radio Depot and Inspectors having complete durisdiction over all radio frequencies, for all purposes. moza 13:19, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
Are the Tea Rooms actually at the summit of Mt Eden. I thought they were down a bit. GrahamBould 14:01, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
All the other suburbs seem off. Morningside is west (maybe even southwest) according to Wises.co.nz, not northwest. Similar for Grafton etc... MadMaxDog 11:33, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
No offense, but I think the picture Image:Whautree02.jpg isn't good enough to replace one of the existing pictures. It is already linked to the Entelea arborescens plant article, so it isn't as if it will be unused. MadMaxDog 00:55, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
I saw the article in Google Earth, but it was near the "New Zealand Sub-Antarctic Islands", not Auckland. So I guess the coordinates are not quite right?
Kinghcicken2 12:36, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
When I click the coordinates in Wikipedia, the right place shows up in Google Earth. But when I am just browsing in Google Earth I see the link to the article with the old wrong coordinates. So I guess it's a caching or update problem of Google Earth. My mistake. -- KingChicken 13:57, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
FixBunching seems not work properly. Could I ask why not just use 300px or 250px to fix the width of the image? -- Dayten ( talk) 01:47, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
Early in the article, it says that Mt Eden is the second-highest natural point in the Auckland Region. Later in the article, it says that it is the highest.
Which of these are true? I can't think of any point higher in the immediate vicinity, but of course the "Auckland Region" is quite large. Nzseries1 ( talk) 03:04, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
I think this page should be split into two pages (for the suburb and the volcano) to bring it into line with other Auckland volcano pages. Haminoon ( talk) 00:45, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
I think that in an encyclopedic sense "Mount Eden" should be referring to the volcano more than the suburb; suburbs don't really recieve recognition in an encyclopedia, volcanoes do. Would it be worth making the article about the volcano (not the suburb)? Neonumbers 08:51, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
The result of the debate was don't move. — Nightstallion (?) 10:18, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
Mount Eden → Mount Eden, New Zealand – {reason for move} copied from the entry on the WP:RM page
"one mans meat is another mans poison". dunno, but sometimes I wonder where this is all going. ok so delete stuff and that will make it better. But how about move that content to wwhere it is needed? If you put it in a stubb then it will be suggested to be moved to a common article, and thats where it cam from. perhaps put it in the talk page to assemble it for its ultimate destination. thats too hard for some, deletion is real easy. It may be irrelevant to some, but not to others, the usual plan is to talk about it first, or at least give better reasoning, but I am still trying to understand how thats being bold. deletion is kinda bold, but even boldness could come with some sensitivity. moza 13:19, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
Typical use of the facilty was for Taxi, Trucks and Vans, and any business needing mobile communications back to their office. The scheme was designed as a work around for the topography and small scale business needs of New Zealand, with the then NZPO ( New Zealand Post Office) Radio Depot and Inspectors having complete durisdiction over all radio frequencies, for all purposes. moza 13:19, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
Are the Tea Rooms actually at the summit of Mt Eden. I thought they were down a bit. GrahamBould 14:01, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
All the other suburbs seem off. Morningside is west (maybe even southwest) according to Wises.co.nz, not northwest. Similar for Grafton etc... MadMaxDog 11:33, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
No offense, but I think the picture Image:Whautree02.jpg isn't good enough to replace one of the existing pictures. It is already linked to the Entelea arborescens plant article, so it isn't as if it will be unused. MadMaxDog 00:55, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
I saw the article in Google Earth, but it was near the "New Zealand Sub-Antarctic Islands", not Auckland. So I guess the coordinates are not quite right?
Kinghcicken2 12:36, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
When I click the coordinates in Wikipedia, the right place shows up in Google Earth. But when I am just browsing in Google Earth I see the link to the article with the old wrong coordinates. So I guess it's a caching or update problem of Google Earth. My mistake. -- KingChicken 13:57, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
FixBunching seems not work properly. Could I ask why not just use 300px or 250px to fix the width of the image? -- Dayten ( talk) 01:47, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
Early in the article, it says that Mt Eden is the second-highest natural point in the Auckland Region. Later in the article, it says that it is the highest.
Which of these are true? I can't think of any point higher in the immediate vicinity, but of course the "Auckland Region" is quite large. Nzseries1 ( talk) 03:04, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
I think this page should be split into two pages (for the suburb and the volcano) to bring it into line with other Auckland volcano pages. Haminoon ( talk) 00:45, 2 November 2014 (UTC)