This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of an educational assignment in 2013 Q3. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Louisiana State University/HNRS 1035 Natural Disturbances & Society (Spring 2014)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki. |
Interestingly there's only one image in the BC Archives, and only one textual record, which are the papers of the eponymous Mr. Breakenridge - and the image may be on the slopes of Breakenridge, with the mountain shown being Richardson or wahtever it is on the other side of Harrison Lake (the northernmost summit of the Douglas Ranges, or the one to the south of it; can't tell from the light/angle). Just for quick sourcing, and to get past all the Wikiclones and peakbagger/bivouac spinoffs, I made a google search for "Mount Breakenridge"+"hazard" - if using "geotechnical hazard" it only gets you to the FVRD's report (which is interesting enough all by itself). I haven't hunted through the google yet; if anything you'd hope the Ministry of Environment or the Ministry of Forests or someone in the provgov, if not the fedgov (as you'd also hope).... Skookum1 ( talk) 00:35, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
[undent]Not sure if this will work but this is a "bookmark" from within the Basemap Online Store; it's impossible to mail/save their maps anymore, they want magic beans in return. so in that one shot where i said it might be the nearer one, it's definitely the farther one; and in the one where I mention Long Island on the left, it will be the peak in the background....and probably was a long lens, definitely not a wide-angle.... Skookum1 ( talk) 17:15, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
Someone had posted the CME's entry about Breaknridge as a cite ont eh Harrison Hot Sprigns page, which of coruse isn't reliable in Wiki terms; I wrote it. So I looked around to legitimize the citations and so I've been slowly browsing for a suitable proper cite, i.e. a provincial government report etc but linked ones are not all that common; and many are only in FVRD refernces ot private consultant's reports, e.g. on this page. I thought about just quoting this FRD report, but it still doesn't vie details of the anticipated wave size etc; the reliability of private consultancies is also at issue, though perhaps no less reliable than by the government's own engineers; just with different priorities. I'll keep looking, but if there's a way to use the link I just cited here instead of bivouac. it's recommended as, again, it was me who penned Bivouac's little note...there's a report somewhere with pictures of the fracture zone, I'll ry to find it again.... Skookum1 ( talk) 02:56, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Mount Breakenridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:18, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of an educational assignment in 2013 Q3. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Louisiana State University/HNRS 1035 Natural Disturbances & Society (Spring 2014)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki. |
Interestingly there's only one image in the BC Archives, and only one textual record, which are the papers of the eponymous Mr. Breakenridge - and the image may be on the slopes of Breakenridge, with the mountain shown being Richardson or wahtever it is on the other side of Harrison Lake (the northernmost summit of the Douglas Ranges, or the one to the south of it; can't tell from the light/angle). Just for quick sourcing, and to get past all the Wikiclones and peakbagger/bivouac spinoffs, I made a google search for "Mount Breakenridge"+"hazard" - if using "geotechnical hazard" it only gets you to the FVRD's report (which is interesting enough all by itself). I haven't hunted through the google yet; if anything you'd hope the Ministry of Environment or the Ministry of Forests or someone in the provgov, if not the fedgov (as you'd also hope).... Skookum1 ( talk) 00:35, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
[undent]Not sure if this will work but this is a "bookmark" from within the Basemap Online Store; it's impossible to mail/save their maps anymore, they want magic beans in return. so in that one shot where i said it might be the nearer one, it's definitely the farther one; and in the one where I mention Long Island on the left, it will be the peak in the background....and probably was a long lens, definitely not a wide-angle.... Skookum1 ( talk) 17:15, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
Someone had posted the CME's entry about Breaknridge as a cite ont eh Harrison Hot Sprigns page, which of coruse isn't reliable in Wiki terms; I wrote it. So I looked around to legitimize the citations and so I've been slowly browsing for a suitable proper cite, i.e. a provincial government report etc but linked ones are not all that common; and many are only in FVRD refernces ot private consultant's reports, e.g. on this page. I thought about just quoting this FRD report, but it still doesn't vie details of the anticipated wave size etc; the reliability of private consultancies is also at issue, though perhaps no less reliable than by the government's own engineers; just with different priorities. I'll keep looking, but if there's a way to use the link I just cited here instead of bivouac. it's recommended as, again, it was me who penned Bivouac's little note...there's a report somewhere with pictures of the fracture zone, I'll ry to find it again.... Skookum1 ( talk) 02:56, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Mount Breakenridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:18, 6 February 2018 (UTC)