I have also removed Israeli and Syrian parent categories to avoid creating edit wars. The Israeli occupied territories category supercedes inclusion in parent categories. -- nsaum75 ¡שיחת! 22:23, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
More correct and neutral terms in accordance with international community views: [1] -- Supreme Deliciousness ( talk) 15:36, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
explain to me like I am 3 year old, what does a picture of a coffee shop add to an article about the mountain? nableezy - 21:45, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
"lookout point towards Syria in the east" "flowing into Syria" against the entire world viewpoint, this can not stay. -- Supreme Deliciousness ( talk) 22:22, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
I have already made a post there, the vast majority of responses agree that its not a reliable source, that JVL article is also sourced from wikipedia, I have already mentioned this at the talkpage and edit summary, and you have also removed the "the rest of" without saying anything although I have already explained the reason for it above. I find your behaviour extremely disruptive if not pure vandalism. -- Supreme Deliciousness ( talk) 20:14, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
And how does Maliks last response affect anything I have done, this conversation, or the JVL article sourced from wikipedia? you have not replied to why you re inserted the Israeli pov. I don't know what this is supposed to be [15] you have changed it so the water flows the other way for some reason, and you have not removed the Israeli pov from the lookout point towards the rest of Syria. [16] -- Supreme Deliciousness ( talk) 20:34, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
I have also removed Israeli and Syrian parent categories to avoid creating edit wars. The Israeli occupied territories category supercedes inclusion in parent categories. -- nsaum75 ¡שיחת! 22:23, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
More correct and neutral terms in accordance with international community views: [1] -- Supreme Deliciousness ( talk) 15:36, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
explain to me like I am 3 year old, what does a picture of a coffee shop add to an article about the mountain? nableezy - 21:45, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
"lookout point towards Syria in the east" "flowing into Syria" against the entire world viewpoint, this can not stay. -- Supreme Deliciousness ( talk) 22:22, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
I have already made a post there, the vast majority of responses agree that its not a reliable source, that JVL article is also sourced from wikipedia, I have already mentioned this at the talkpage and edit summary, and you have also removed the "the rest of" without saying anything although I have already explained the reason for it above. I find your behaviour extremely disruptive if not pure vandalism. -- Supreme Deliciousness ( talk) 20:14, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
And how does Maliks last response affect anything I have done, this conversation, or the JVL article sourced from wikipedia? you have not replied to why you re inserted the Israeli pov. I don't know what this is supposed to be [15] you have changed it so the water flows the other way for some reason, and you have not removed the Israeli pov from the lookout point towards the rest of Syria. [16] -- Supreme Deliciousness ( talk) 20:34, 15 March 2010 (UTC)