![]() | A fact from Mound 72 appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 9 April 2013 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Here Template:Did you know nominations/Mound 72. He iro 22:08, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
The archive.org link for Cahokia: The Great Native American Metropolis is apparently broken - http://www.archive.org/stream/cahokiagreatnati00youn/cahokiagreatnati00youn_djvu.txt just returns an error. Checking the main index page for that book at http://archive.org/details/cahokiagreatnati00youn reports "issues with its content"; don't know what those might be, but it sounds ominous! I've removed the link for now. Andrew Gray ( talk) 20:33, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
'The arrowheads suggested that Cahokia had extensive trade links'
'The arrowheads demonstrated Cahokia's extensive trade links'
No, they did not demonstrate that - which to me as a scientist means, conclusively proved.
Does my re-edit 'strongly indicated that' strike the balance? Narky Blert ( talk) 22:03, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Mound 72. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:42, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
Why no C14 dates for the bodies? 104.153.40.58 ( talk) 17:27, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
![]() | A fact from Mound 72 appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 9 April 2013 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Here Template:Did you know nominations/Mound 72. He iro 22:08, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
The archive.org link for Cahokia: The Great Native American Metropolis is apparently broken - http://www.archive.org/stream/cahokiagreatnati00youn/cahokiagreatnati00youn_djvu.txt just returns an error. Checking the main index page for that book at http://archive.org/details/cahokiagreatnati00youn reports "issues with its content"; don't know what those might be, but it sounds ominous! I've removed the link for now. Andrew Gray ( talk) 20:33, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
'The arrowheads suggested that Cahokia had extensive trade links'
'The arrowheads demonstrated Cahokia's extensive trade links'
No, they did not demonstrate that - which to me as a scientist means, conclusively proved.
Does my re-edit 'strongly indicated that' strike the balance? Narky Blert ( talk) 22:03, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Mound 72. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:42, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
Why no C14 dates for the bodies? 104.153.40.58 ( talk) 17:27, 21 May 2023 (UTC)