This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Opencliq is nothing more then a guy ripping off handlerexploit's roms. I highly doubt he is capable of realeasing anything other then modified version of his roms. there is no need for his site to be mentioned several times in this article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.107.144.2 ( talk) 23:59, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
Seeing as in everywhere except the US this is the Moto DEXT, shouldn't this article really be called Motorola DEXT, and have a redirect from Motorola CLIQ linking here? Sheepdean ( talk) 20:14, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
I would say stick with Motorola CLIQ, since it's primary market is the United States. As well, from what I've read, the DEXT will have some minor software differences from the CLIQ and since all the information is regarding the US Version, so it makes sense to keep it CLIQ. 198.161.51.49 ( talk) 16:02, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
There's no way that section is neutral. Honestly, from the way it is worded, it appears that someone is using Wikipedia as a Soapbox to criticize Motorola. ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ② talk 13:42, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
I agree. However as they promised us that there would be an upgrade and then there wasn't and I took up a 2 year contract as a consequence under the illusion of free upgrades I can only say that's the last time Motorola get any money from me. Swines...
I propose that Motorola CLIQ XT be merged into Motorola CLIQ. The XT is a variant of the CLIQ, and the XT page is a grand total of two lines long. It could easily be a sub-section on this page. JaffaCakeLover ( talk) 17:37, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Motorola Cliq. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:34, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
A search for "Cliq" redirects directly to this page, with no option for an ambiguity page. I can't tell if there isn't a page created for the CLIQ technology for locks (used by Assa Abloy, Mul-T-Lock, and others) on Wikipedia, or if it simply isn't showing up because of the popularity of items relating to this topic.
How does an ambiguity page get created?
Cheers -
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Opencliq is nothing more then a guy ripping off handlerexploit's roms. I highly doubt he is capable of realeasing anything other then modified version of his roms. there is no need for his site to be mentioned several times in this article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.107.144.2 ( talk) 23:59, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
Seeing as in everywhere except the US this is the Moto DEXT, shouldn't this article really be called Motorola DEXT, and have a redirect from Motorola CLIQ linking here? Sheepdean ( talk) 20:14, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
I would say stick with Motorola CLIQ, since it's primary market is the United States. As well, from what I've read, the DEXT will have some minor software differences from the CLIQ and since all the information is regarding the US Version, so it makes sense to keep it CLIQ. 198.161.51.49 ( talk) 16:02, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
There's no way that section is neutral. Honestly, from the way it is worded, it appears that someone is using Wikipedia as a Soapbox to criticize Motorola. ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ② talk 13:42, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
I agree. However as they promised us that there would be an upgrade and then there wasn't and I took up a 2 year contract as a consequence under the illusion of free upgrades I can only say that's the last time Motorola get any money from me. Swines...
I propose that Motorola CLIQ XT be merged into Motorola CLIQ. The XT is a variant of the CLIQ, and the XT page is a grand total of two lines long. It could easily be a sub-section on this page. JaffaCakeLover ( talk) 17:37, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Motorola Cliq. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:34, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
A search for "Cliq" redirects directly to this page, with no option for an ambiguity page. I can't tell if there isn't a page created for the CLIQ technology for locks (used by Assa Abloy, Mul-T-Lock, and others) on Wikipedia, or if it simply isn't showing up because of the popularity of items relating to this topic.
How does an ambiguity page get created?
Cheers -