This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an anatomical diagram or diagrams be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Specific illustrations, plots or diagrams can be requested at the
Graphic Lab. For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images. |
Richwil ( talk) 08:45, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
I see that a "banner" has requested this. This would be a nice addition. (Sorry, but I'm not a brain scholar so I can't be of help to improve the page, not without a lot of "scholarship" ) -- In fact, I'm at this page to find out where the motor cortex is located in xyz). Bill Wvbailey ( talk) 23:31, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
FireBrandon ( talk) 21:57, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
This part is a translation of the corresponding German wikipedia article. -- Bandadas ( talk) 14:28, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
Just a reminder, that there only needs to be one wikilink referencing an article from this page, every mention of this thing/person/place doesn't need to be another link. One time is enough. - Iamozy ( talk) 14:06, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
It seems that this article begins by stating that the primary motor cortex is a subdivision of the motor cortex. But then throughout the article the discussion predominantly concerns primary motor cortex. I think this type of information should be moved to the primary motor cortex page. Also, the picture is misleading because it is also only the primary motor cortex that is pictured. SMA and premotor areas are not diagrammed.
Then that leaves the question: what is the purpose of this page?
Gccwang ( talk) 06:12, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
I recently replaced the picture of the motor cortex on this article with one that I created for the page. My reasons for doing so are that the original picture depicts the motor cortex as being bigger than it is in real life and does not include the cerebellum as reference to figure out where the motor cortex is. When I posted the new picture, it was accepted but due to a problem in which my sister tried to make a prank, Guliolopez reverted the picture out of legitimate concern that my account might have intentions of vandalism. This was a misunderstanding and after making sure my sisters damages were fixed I went her to change the picture back to the improved one. Meters then jumped into the interaction and changed the photo back to the original (and current. Meters stated: "this picture is not an improvement. Take it to talk or leave it alone" I value both Meters opinion and advice so I decided to do just that. I contend that the photo is an improvement and want people using wikipedia to have access to it. I encourage anyone to look into this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SCtheeditor ( talk • contribs) 18:29, June 10, 2018 (UTC)
I think that you will find that the lines match each other. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SCtheeditor ( talk • contribs) 20:11, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
Meters here it is File:Close up proof of originality.jpg this close up photo shows you where the pen marks are as proof that it is drawn not printed. Additionally, while I would not claim that my image is anywhere near to perfect, one concern that I have with File:Human_motor_cortex.jpg is that it does appear to be a bit grainy. The original reason that I decided to put time and effort into improving it was because I (as a viewer who did not yet have a wikipedia account) felt it looked a bit unprofesional. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SCtheeditor ( talk • contribs) 20:25, June 10, 2018 (UTC)
this is fake dont read it unless you want fake information go to an deferint website for real informatoin dont b tricked by the good writing ITS FAKE INFRMATION — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:569:FDC0:9E00:DCB:5F99:DC86:4D71 ( talk) 01:30, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an anatomical diagram or diagrams be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Specific illustrations, plots or diagrams can be requested at the
Graphic Lab. For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images. |
Richwil ( talk) 08:45, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
I see that a "banner" has requested this. This would be a nice addition. (Sorry, but I'm not a brain scholar so I can't be of help to improve the page, not without a lot of "scholarship" ) -- In fact, I'm at this page to find out where the motor cortex is located in xyz). Bill Wvbailey ( talk) 23:31, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
FireBrandon ( talk) 21:57, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
This part is a translation of the corresponding German wikipedia article. -- Bandadas ( talk) 14:28, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
Just a reminder, that there only needs to be one wikilink referencing an article from this page, every mention of this thing/person/place doesn't need to be another link. One time is enough. - Iamozy ( talk) 14:06, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
It seems that this article begins by stating that the primary motor cortex is a subdivision of the motor cortex. But then throughout the article the discussion predominantly concerns primary motor cortex. I think this type of information should be moved to the primary motor cortex page. Also, the picture is misleading because it is also only the primary motor cortex that is pictured. SMA and premotor areas are not diagrammed.
Then that leaves the question: what is the purpose of this page?
Gccwang ( talk) 06:12, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
I recently replaced the picture of the motor cortex on this article with one that I created for the page. My reasons for doing so are that the original picture depicts the motor cortex as being bigger than it is in real life and does not include the cerebellum as reference to figure out where the motor cortex is. When I posted the new picture, it was accepted but due to a problem in which my sister tried to make a prank, Guliolopez reverted the picture out of legitimate concern that my account might have intentions of vandalism. This was a misunderstanding and after making sure my sisters damages were fixed I went her to change the picture back to the improved one. Meters then jumped into the interaction and changed the photo back to the original (and current. Meters stated: "this picture is not an improvement. Take it to talk or leave it alone" I value both Meters opinion and advice so I decided to do just that. I contend that the photo is an improvement and want people using wikipedia to have access to it. I encourage anyone to look into this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SCtheeditor ( talk • contribs) 18:29, June 10, 2018 (UTC)
I think that you will find that the lines match each other. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SCtheeditor ( talk • contribs) 20:11, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
Meters here it is File:Close up proof of originality.jpg this close up photo shows you where the pen marks are as proof that it is drawn not printed. Additionally, while I would not claim that my image is anywhere near to perfect, one concern that I have with File:Human_motor_cortex.jpg is that it does appear to be a bit grainy. The original reason that I decided to put time and effort into improving it was because I (as a viewer who did not yet have a wikipedia account) felt it looked a bit unprofesional. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SCtheeditor ( talk • contribs) 20:25, June 10, 2018 (UTC)
this is fake dont read it unless you want fake information go to an deferint website for real informatoin dont b tricked by the good writing ITS FAKE INFRMATION — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:569:FDC0:9E00:DCB:5F99:DC86:4D71 ( talk) 01:30, 10 December 2020 (UTC)