GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: – MuZemike 20:32, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
Overall, it's fairly well-written, and, after taking some time to look at the sources, most everything seems to be properly verified. I went through and made some minor grammar/punctuation tweaks as well as remove some noun plus '-ing' and other wordy stuff. Just a couple of minor issues before I go ahead and pass for GA:
On hold pending resolution to the three issues noted above. Otherwise, it's pretty good so far; if you can expand a bit more and tie down all the MoS stuff, this could conceivably make a run for WP:FAC. – MuZemike 20:32, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
Should be fixed now. Thanks for your edits.♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:18, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
Thanks.♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:34, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: – MuZemike 20:32, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
Overall, it's fairly well-written, and, after taking some time to look at the sources, most everything seems to be properly verified. I went through and made some minor grammar/punctuation tweaks as well as remove some noun plus '-ing' and other wordy stuff. Just a couple of minor issues before I go ahead and pass for GA:
On hold pending resolution to the three issues noted above. Otherwise, it's pretty good so far; if you can expand a bit more and tie down all the MoS stuff, this could conceivably make a run for WP:FAC. – MuZemike 20:32, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
Should be fixed now. Thanks for your edits.♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:18, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
Thanks.♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:34, 31 March 2011 (UTC)