Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Crowz RSA 00:50, 12 January 2011 (UTC) reply

• I am going to have to fail the article for the following reasons:

• YouTube isn't a reliable source.
• References need cleaning up, as there are bare references, and ref 11 and ref 8 needs more info
• Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”.
• "Origins of the term" → "Term origins"
• "Origins of the dance" → "Dance origins"
• Too many bold terms throughout the article.
• Surly there is some infobox for the article
• Quotes should have a reference directly after the quote.
• References should only go after punctuation.
• There are several things that go unverified.
• A thorough copy-edit is needed before it can ever pass.
• There are several more problems throughout the page. I suggest a Peer Review.

• Sorry, Crowz RSA 00:50, 12 January 2011 (UTC) reply