This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Moses in Islam article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Umang
It would be sensible to include references to which sura is being described, every couple of paragraphs or so. The reader can't tell what of this legend is actually incorporated in the Koran (Qur'an) and what is the legend that has developed round it. Wetman 14:11, 2 Mar 2004 (UTC)
I strongly agree. 29 Jan 06
There is no single verse in Quran that states that Musa went to a mountain and never came. Quraan didn't mention his death, but according to Prophet Muhammed's talks, Mussa was confronted by the angel of death who at that time appeared when he was about to take people's souls, since Musa was strong, he beat the angel of death, and the angel went without taking Musa's soul.
Then God told Musa to put his hand on a goat's skin, and the number of goat hairs his hand will cover will be the number of years he will live, but then Musa chose to be near God, and he chose to die. Since then, the Angel of death is invisble.
This is the Islamic story of Musa's death, and I am sure of it, so plz change the info on the page. thx
right, but you need a link to a credible source. and remember to sign your post with four tildes(~ ~ ~ ~) 75.72.25.219 ( talk) 04:45, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
The claims about the first borns of Egyptians dying, the son of the Firawn dying and Firawn giving up his defiance is unsubstantiated in Islam as far as I know. If nobody comes up with references I am going to delete them. -- Abdousi 05:10, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I also noted that, so I deleted it. 29 Jan 06
I added a section "Musa in Judao-Christian thought" because... well, this should link back to Moses, the Christian version with a little blurb as that article links here. Granted, I think 95+% of the editors here know him as Moses but, I don't think this should be only about Islamic thought... and yet Moses be about Mostly Christian and then link here... does that seem right? This is primarily Musa from Islamic thought but from this perspective we acknowledge that Christians and Jews are part of this tradition as well. Does that seem sensible? gren グレン 08:39, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
It seems to me that, unlike the case with Jesus/ Isa, the Muslim view of Moses/Musa is virtually identical to the Judeo-Christian view, except that they use different names. Would not a brief section in the Moses article outlining Muslims views, and where they differ (if at all) from Judeo-Christian views, be sufficient? As it stands, the story outlined here is virtually identical to the story given in Exodus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy, and in later Jewish legendology. john k 19:47, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
This article ought be retitled "Moses in Islam", with a prominent link back to the Moses article across the top.
Along with reconciling it to the standards of an English-language article, it would bring in a broader mix of editors, and help curb blatant POV such as "Musa is a prophet of Islam", "the stories of his life", etc. Also, this article could benefit from more copy editting; more traffic can only help the situation. Timothy Usher 07:41, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
Anonymous editor, you cannot say Moses is considered a prophet of Islam without qualification, as the vast majority of non-Muslims do not consider him so. Merely mentioning Islam does not suffice, much less does the use of Arabic translations in place of standard English. Can there be anyone who believes that Moses was not a prophet of Islam, but Musa was?
Please read and respond to this point before reverting again. Timothy Usher 21:12, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
Moses is Nationality isn't Israelite it's Islam. So I suggest you on putting Moses is Nationality as Islam. JohnnyDab31353 ( talk) 02:27, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
who ever went and got all those page references did a great job. very helpful.
From the section 'God calls Moses', the end of the alst paragraph.
"Here Moses used his staff to part the ocean that allowed the Israelites to pass through, then the (Firawn,Pharaoh) also followed but the ocean closed on him drowning and killing Firawn and his entire army. and now (Firawn,Pharaohs) body can be seen in musuems all over the world plus scientist have proved that Firawn died from drowning and were shocked because his body was preserved in such a manner after all these years which is like a miracle, and god also states in the quran hus body will be preserved as a sign for future generations."
Tha bits above in bold. Where did the statement come from, what backup / proof is there; are there any references available?
This article uses the English "God" frequently and only once uses the latin translitteration of arabic "Allah". Since "Allah" is the definite article "al" before "ila" (god) it seems to me that the one use of "Allah" could be changed to "God." Of course, I don't want to change it and start any fights, so I'm posting here first. 05:10, 8 September 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.122.55.53 ( talk)
This needs to be merged with the regular article Moses. Since Muslimes recognize the Bible that Jews and Christians use, having a separate article is a nuisance and unhelpful as pointed out by many previous editors above, long before me. What are we waiting for? Student7 ( talk) 23:03, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
Islamic view of Moses → Moses — This duplicates information in standard article Moses. This is the same Moses, using the same resource as the other two religions do. — Student7 ( talk) 23:08, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
I notice other articles on Islamic views of Hebrew characters contain lists of the significant references to that character in the Qur'an -- but this article doesn't (and it would be really useful for me right now if it did!). Has there been any discussion to adding a list of significant passages that deal with Moses/Musa? Thanks, Aristophanes68 ( talk) 03:53, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
Title given to this article of such a importance does not seems at all suitable in my view.The topic's start with 'Islamic' does not make any sense as no one search with word 'Islamic' ,it will start with either 'Moses' or 'Musa' .Any islamic fellow want to serch for Musa does not get any where.If any one want to come from Main article 'Moses', he can always be redirected from there, but one if start with search of 'Musa' will not find any serch result ,hence topic should start with Musa and "Musa( Moses)" is best title possible for the topic ,may pl.agree and discuss further.-- Md iet ( talk) 06:07, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
The title is "Islamic view of Moses", so why does the article have all those pictures that obviously depict Moses from the Christian perspective? Images of prophets are forbidden in Islam, so this article should be devoid of any images. 211.25.129.2 ( talk) 09:43, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
Ok you can say that but what about the picture when searching asiya bint muzahim (given the title of one of the best women to have lived in Islam)-someones bloody put a picture of ariana grande there! Its entirely disrespectful-its not only one picture you need to think about. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.44.190.181 ( talk) 05:34, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
That would be quite a ridiculous thing to do, seeing how manuscript images, and such were allowed under the rulingship of the Caliphs and throughout the Golden age of Islam. Of course this was pre-Wahhabiyyah reign, Wahhabiyyah being a new age a new way, nothing to do with historical Islam. So there is no reason for you to be removing such manuscripts, your idea and view of Islam may be completely different from others who follow the historical religion.-- MuslimKnight786 ( talk) 15:36, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
A template is prepared for prominent prophets .
Lineage of several prophets according to Islamic tradition |
---|
Dotted lines indicate multiple generations. |
This will help at a glance view link between them. Hope this is also of prime importance in this article. If there is no further suggestion on this, we may include this in this article.-- Md iet ( talk) 09:13, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
Audience applause for you CBW, appreciating the efforts made by someone with special help from Joren. Your suggestion will go long way I hope.-- Md iet ( talk) 03:37, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
As suggested, Jacob and Abadullah are deleted from template. These will not affect family links as one major link is still available in between. The further linking is done for Islamic as well as general article. Thanks Amatulic, this has really made template more concise and well connected.--
Md iet (
talk) 07:35, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
Height further reduced by removing
not needed.--
Md iet (
talk) 12:05, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
Look more symmetrical and prominent.Link for Abdul Muttalib also corrected. Thanks CBW,-- Md iet ( talk) 03:17, 11 January 2011 (UTC) Further spell correction done by Joren, thanks. Hope this correction will continue for betterment. For the present it seems that template is ready for inclusion in all related articles.-- Md iet ( talk) 04:59, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
Or this template can now be displayed as a flat box like navigation templates at the bottom of an article by setting a paramter "navbox=yes"
{{Six Islamic Prophets|navbox=yes}}
which may be less intrusive in certain circumstances -- PBS ( talk) 14:57, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
This template can also be displayed with the list collapsed by adding the parameter "expanded=no"
{{Six Islamic Prophets|expanded=no}}
Lineage of several prophets according to Islamic tradition |
---|
Dotted lines indicate multiple generations. |
-- PBS ( talk) 15:01, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
? 24.25.237.226 ( talk) 02:10, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
– The article i want to move to Musa is Islamic view of Moses. As Islamic view of Moses depicting the Prophet Musa in Islam so i believe the name of the page should also be depicting the way it is spelled and understood in Islam. While the Islamic view of Moses would be treated as a redirect to the page Musa and Page Musa should be move to Musa (disambiguation). As the Prophet Musa is a prominent figure in Islam therefore majority of the places and names of person are named after Him as also show in Musa (disambiguation) page. So i believe the primary topic should be Islamic view of Moses and the disambiguation page Musa should be moved to Musa (disambiguation). Please provide your opinion regarding the move with justification whether positive or negative. Ibrahim ebi ( talk) 03:43, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Islamic views on Abraham which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 20:13, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Abraham in Islam which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 14:58, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
Once Prophet Moses saw devil (Prophets can see devil) was crying very much. He said, why you are crying? Devil answered because God doesn't forgive me. Prophet Moses said, I ask your forgiveness from God. He discussed it with God, Allah said ok I forgive him but he has to say that I'm not better than human. Prophet oses told devil. In answer Devil said no I'm better, I am from fire and human from soil.
[User:Mjesfahani|MansourJE]] ( talk) 12:27 16 July 2015 (UTC)
"family tree with prophets on right" is intended to convey. It seems to have been introduced several years ago. My guess is that it's intended to refer to some sort of diagram and is a placeholder of some sort, but is now obsolete. I'm going to delete it, but if someone cares to restore it, perhaps they could explain what it means a bit better. Wcoole ( talk) 01:21, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
2.147.214.57 ( talk) 07:58, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
"God" is a regression of Gotan, that includes a second tree, where one becomes "God". This is not part of the original Gotan religion, neither Islam. Gotan though is like Allah, and Ragnarok, Vàlhàll and Hél corresponds to Judgement day, Jannah and Jahannam. On the islamic side, Allah is not associated with secs, or their sufism either. Clearing this up, the "christian" distortion of a second tree, hallucinogenic drugs, and claims of being "god" has many similarities to the pantheism of the sufis, and may be seen as irreligious conflicts, and really conflicts of sectarian regressions, rather than the original religion, which is culturally corresponding. Which indeed, in religion science, if prophets really talked about the same deity, then it would be so.
I suggest that all articles that deal with Allah, not use the regression "God". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.211.164.8 ( talk) 15:06, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
he was a very repectful man — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.110.120.240 ( talk) 02:15, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Hi, please see Talk:Ishmael#Historicity of Ishmael versus Moses and Abraham. Thank you, IZAK ( talk) 18:30, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
Musa(prophet) and has thus listed it
for discussion. This discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 22#Musa(prophet) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Steel1943 (
talk) 06:03, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
These are two completely different names. why are they used interchangeably? I understand they sound similar, but they're not the same, this is exactly why the author of qoran got it mixed up 121.200.6.85 ( talk) 22:00, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Majid 39.48.25.128 ( talk) 06:58, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Some people say it’s Ramses II but this is a bit confusing……………………………………….. Mathsmaster707 ( talk) 09:46, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
The redirect
Pharaoh in Islam has been listed at
redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the
redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 28 § Pharaoh in Islam until a consensus is reached.
Veverve (
talk) 21:29, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
under the "Escape to Midian" and "Prophecy", the Image file of Midian Mountains and Mount Sinai is missing, but the caption and source is still displayed on the page SiWa12 ( talk) 10:23, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
For example, this "His revelations, such as the Ten Commandments, which form part of the contents of the Torah and are central to the Abrahamic religions of Judaism and Christianity." is not a sentence. Kriegman ( talk) 18:15, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Moses in Islam article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Umang
It would be sensible to include references to which sura is being described, every couple of paragraphs or so. The reader can't tell what of this legend is actually incorporated in the Koran (Qur'an) and what is the legend that has developed round it. Wetman 14:11, 2 Mar 2004 (UTC)
I strongly agree. 29 Jan 06
There is no single verse in Quran that states that Musa went to a mountain and never came. Quraan didn't mention his death, but according to Prophet Muhammed's talks, Mussa was confronted by the angel of death who at that time appeared when he was about to take people's souls, since Musa was strong, he beat the angel of death, and the angel went without taking Musa's soul.
Then God told Musa to put his hand on a goat's skin, and the number of goat hairs his hand will cover will be the number of years he will live, but then Musa chose to be near God, and he chose to die. Since then, the Angel of death is invisble.
This is the Islamic story of Musa's death, and I am sure of it, so plz change the info on the page. thx
right, but you need a link to a credible source. and remember to sign your post with four tildes(~ ~ ~ ~) 75.72.25.219 ( talk) 04:45, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
The claims about the first borns of Egyptians dying, the son of the Firawn dying and Firawn giving up his defiance is unsubstantiated in Islam as far as I know. If nobody comes up with references I am going to delete them. -- Abdousi 05:10, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I also noted that, so I deleted it. 29 Jan 06
I added a section "Musa in Judao-Christian thought" because... well, this should link back to Moses, the Christian version with a little blurb as that article links here. Granted, I think 95+% of the editors here know him as Moses but, I don't think this should be only about Islamic thought... and yet Moses be about Mostly Christian and then link here... does that seem right? This is primarily Musa from Islamic thought but from this perspective we acknowledge that Christians and Jews are part of this tradition as well. Does that seem sensible? gren グレン 08:39, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
It seems to me that, unlike the case with Jesus/ Isa, the Muslim view of Moses/Musa is virtually identical to the Judeo-Christian view, except that they use different names. Would not a brief section in the Moses article outlining Muslims views, and where they differ (if at all) from Judeo-Christian views, be sufficient? As it stands, the story outlined here is virtually identical to the story given in Exodus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy, and in later Jewish legendology. john k 19:47, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
This article ought be retitled "Moses in Islam", with a prominent link back to the Moses article across the top.
Along with reconciling it to the standards of an English-language article, it would bring in a broader mix of editors, and help curb blatant POV such as "Musa is a prophet of Islam", "the stories of his life", etc. Also, this article could benefit from more copy editting; more traffic can only help the situation. Timothy Usher 07:41, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
Anonymous editor, you cannot say Moses is considered a prophet of Islam without qualification, as the vast majority of non-Muslims do not consider him so. Merely mentioning Islam does not suffice, much less does the use of Arabic translations in place of standard English. Can there be anyone who believes that Moses was not a prophet of Islam, but Musa was?
Please read and respond to this point before reverting again. Timothy Usher 21:12, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
Moses is Nationality isn't Israelite it's Islam. So I suggest you on putting Moses is Nationality as Islam. JohnnyDab31353 ( talk) 02:27, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
who ever went and got all those page references did a great job. very helpful.
From the section 'God calls Moses', the end of the alst paragraph.
"Here Moses used his staff to part the ocean that allowed the Israelites to pass through, then the (Firawn,Pharaoh) also followed but the ocean closed on him drowning and killing Firawn and his entire army. and now (Firawn,Pharaohs) body can be seen in musuems all over the world plus scientist have proved that Firawn died from drowning and were shocked because his body was preserved in such a manner after all these years which is like a miracle, and god also states in the quran hus body will be preserved as a sign for future generations."
Tha bits above in bold. Where did the statement come from, what backup / proof is there; are there any references available?
This article uses the English "God" frequently and only once uses the latin translitteration of arabic "Allah". Since "Allah" is the definite article "al" before "ila" (god) it seems to me that the one use of "Allah" could be changed to "God." Of course, I don't want to change it and start any fights, so I'm posting here first. 05:10, 8 September 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.122.55.53 ( talk)
This needs to be merged with the regular article Moses. Since Muslimes recognize the Bible that Jews and Christians use, having a separate article is a nuisance and unhelpful as pointed out by many previous editors above, long before me. What are we waiting for? Student7 ( talk) 23:03, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
Islamic view of Moses → Moses — This duplicates information in standard article Moses. This is the same Moses, using the same resource as the other two religions do. — Student7 ( talk) 23:08, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
I notice other articles on Islamic views of Hebrew characters contain lists of the significant references to that character in the Qur'an -- but this article doesn't (and it would be really useful for me right now if it did!). Has there been any discussion to adding a list of significant passages that deal with Moses/Musa? Thanks, Aristophanes68 ( talk) 03:53, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
Title given to this article of such a importance does not seems at all suitable in my view.The topic's start with 'Islamic' does not make any sense as no one search with word 'Islamic' ,it will start with either 'Moses' or 'Musa' .Any islamic fellow want to serch for Musa does not get any where.If any one want to come from Main article 'Moses', he can always be redirected from there, but one if start with search of 'Musa' will not find any serch result ,hence topic should start with Musa and "Musa( Moses)" is best title possible for the topic ,may pl.agree and discuss further.-- Md iet ( talk) 06:07, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
The title is "Islamic view of Moses", so why does the article have all those pictures that obviously depict Moses from the Christian perspective? Images of prophets are forbidden in Islam, so this article should be devoid of any images. 211.25.129.2 ( talk) 09:43, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
Ok you can say that but what about the picture when searching asiya bint muzahim (given the title of one of the best women to have lived in Islam)-someones bloody put a picture of ariana grande there! Its entirely disrespectful-its not only one picture you need to think about. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.44.190.181 ( talk) 05:34, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
That would be quite a ridiculous thing to do, seeing how manuscript images, and such were allowed under the rulingship of the Caliphs and throughout the Golden age of Islam. Of course this was pre-Wahhabiyyah reign, Wahhabiyyah being a new age a new way, nothing to do with historical Islam. So there is no reason for you to be removing such manuscripts, your idea and view of Islam may be completely different from others who follow the historical religion.-- MuslimKnight786 ( talk) 15:36, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
A template is prepared for prominent prophets .
Lineage of several prophets according to Islamic tradition |
---|
Dotted lines indicate multiple generations. |
This will help at a glance view link between them. Hope this is also of prime importance in this article. If there is no further suggestion on this, we may include this in this article.-- Md iet ( talk) 09:13, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
Audience applause for you CBW, appreciating the efforts made by someone with special help from Joren. Your suggestion will go long way I hope.-- Md iet ( talk) 03:37, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
As suggested, Jacob and Abadullah are deleted from template. These will not affect family links as one major link is still available in between. The further linking is done for Islamic as well as general article. Thanks Amatulic, this has really made template more concise and well connected.--
Md iet (
talk) 07:35, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
Height further reduced by removing
not needed.--
Md iet (
talk) 12:05, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
Look more symmetrical and prominent.Link for Abdul Muttalib also corrected. Thanks CBW,-- Md iet ( talk) 03:17, 11 January 2011 (UTC) Further spell correction done by Joren, thanks. Hope this correction will continue for betterment. For the present it seems that template is ready for inclusion in all related articles.-- Md iet ( talk) 04:59, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
Or this template can now be displayed as a flat box like navigation templates at the bottom of an article by setting a paramter "navbox=yes"
{{Six Islamic Prophets|navbox=yes}}
which may be less intrusive in certain circumstances -- PBS ( talk) 14:57, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
This template can also be displayed with the list collapsed by adding the parameter "expanded=no"
{{Six Islamic Prophets|expanded=no}}
Lineage of several prophets according to Islamic tradition |
---|
Dotted lines indicate multiple generations. |
-- PBS ( talk) 15:01, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
? 24.25.237.226 ( talk) 02:10, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
– The article i want to move to Musa is Islamic view of Moses. As Islamic view of Moses depicting the Prophet Musa in Islam so i believe the name of the page should also be depicting the way it is spelled and understood in Islam. While the Islamic view of Moses would be treated as a redirect to the page Musa and Page Musa should be move to Musa (disambiguation). As the Prophet Musa is a prominent figure in Islam therefore majority of the places and names of person are named after Him as also show in Musa (disambiguation) page. So i believe the primary topic should be Islamic view of Moses and the disambiguation page Musa should be moved to Musa (disambiguation). Please provide your opinion regarding the move with justification whether positive or negative. Ibrahim ebi ( talk) 03:43, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Islamic views on Abraham which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 20:13, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Abraham in Islam which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 14:58, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
Once Prophet Moses saw devil (Prophets can see devil) was crying very much. He said, why you are crying? Devil answered because God doesn't forgive me. Prophet Moses said, I ask your forgiveness from God. He discussed it with God, Allah said ok I forgive him but he has to say that I'm not better than human. Prophet oses told devil. In answer Devil said no I'm better, I am from fire and human from soil.
[User:Mjesfahani|MansourJE]] ( talk) 12:27 16 July 2015 (UTC)
"family tree with prophets on right" is intended to convey. It seems to have been introduced several years ago. My guess is that it's intended to refer to some sort of diagram and is a placeholder of some sort, but is now obsolete. I'm going to delete it, but if someone cares to restore it, perhaps they could explain what it means a bit better. Wcoole ( talk) 01:21, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
2.147.214.57 ( talk) 07:58, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
"God" is a regression of Gotan, that includes a second tree, where one becomes "God". This is not part of the original Gotan religion, neither Islam. Gotan though is like Allah, and Ragnarok, Vàlhàll and Hél corresponds to Judgement day, Jannah and Jahannam. On the islamic side, Allah is not associated with secs, or their sufism either. Clearing this up, the "christian" distortion of a second tree, hallucinogenic drugs, and claims of being "god" has many similarities to the pantheism of the sufis, and may be seen as irreligious conflicts, and really conflicts of sectarian regressions, rather than the original religion, which is culturally corresponding. Which indeed, in religion science, if prophets really talked about the same deity, then it would be so.
I suggest that all articles that deal with Allah, not use the regression "God". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.211.164.8 ( talk) 15:06, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
he was a very repectful man — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.110.120.240 ( talk) 02:15, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Hi, please see Talk:Ishmael#Historicity of Ishmael versus Moses and Abraham. Thank you, IZAK ( talk) 18:30, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
Musa(prophet) and has thus listed it
for discussion. This discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 22#Musa(prophet) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Steel1943 (
talk) 06:03, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
These are two completely different names. why are they used interchangeably? I understand they sound similar, but they're not the same, this is exactly why the author of qoran got it mixed up 121.200.6.85 ( talk) 22:00, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Majid 39.48.25.128 ( talk) 06:58, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Some people say it’s Ramses II but this is a bit confusing……………………………………….. Mathsmaster707 ( talk) 09:46, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
The redirect
Pharaoh in Islam has been listed at
redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the
redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 28 § Pharaoh in Islam until a consensus is reached.
Veverve (
talk) 21:29, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
under the "Escape to Midian" and "Prophecy", the Image file of Midian Mountains and Mount Sinai is missing, but the caption and source is still displayed on the page SiWa12 ( talk) 10:23, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
For example, this "His revelations, such as the Ten Commandments, which form part of the contents of the Torah and are central to the Abrahamic religions of Judaism and Christianity." is not a sentence. Kriegman ( talk) 18:15, 8 March 2024 (UTC)