![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 March 2020 and 12 June 2020. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Skoud001. Peer reviewers:
Cnahin,
Nvega004.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 04:29, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
This article needs a thorough 'going over', for language etc. No time for me to do it, just now but I've starrted. - Ballista 21:23, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
You can say that again: "Almost of human features, when compared with proximal apes were from this nature, not implying a lot of change in structural genes, as classically was considered." Wot? — OttoMäkelä ( talk) 14:17, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
It seems to me that the section 'Background' is not on the same subject. I propose to cut it out, but wait for other comments.
Also note that the bullet points need a bit of fleshing out, and will get it in due course. Macdonald-ross ( talk) 20:18, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
By the way, Greg Laden wrote about this back in 2011, specifically critiquing this article! Chiswick Chap ( talk) 19:23, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 March 2020 and 12 June 2020. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Skoud001. Peer reviewers:
Cnahin,
Nvega004.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 04:29, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
This article needs a thorough 'going over', for language etc. No time for me to do it, just now but I've starrted. - Ballista 21:23, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
You can say that again: "Almost of human features, when compared with proximal apes were from this nature, not implying a lot of change in structural genes, as classically was considered." Wot? — OttoMäkelä ( talk) 14:17, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
It seems to me that the section 'Background' is not on the same subject. I propose to cut it out, but wait for other comments.
Also note that the bullet points need a bit of fleshing out, and will get it in due course. Macdonald-ross ( talk) 20:18, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
By the way, Greg Laden wrote about this back in 2011, specifically critiquing this article! Chiswick Chap ( talk) 19:23, 19 September 2017 (UTC)