More Demi Moore has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
February 23, 2008. The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that in
More Demi Moore,
Demi Moore appeared on the cover of
Vanity Fair eight-months pregnant and wearing only a
diamond ring? |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Demi your still the most beautiful woman in the world
We read: The use of a pregnant sex symbol was in a sense an attempt to combat the pop culture representations of the anathema of the awkward, uncomfortable, and grotesquely excessive female form in a culture that covets thinness. And in another sense an attempt to draw attention to the mag and sell more copies, I'd guess. But forget that; instead, the former. How do we know?
Leibovitz' open and direct portrayal led to divided opinions. The photograph was highly provocative.... It was? I see a photo of a pregnant woman done up very elegantly and covering her naughty bits. What am I missing? -- Hoary ( talk) 00:20, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
We read (after markup stripping): Willis was already an A-list star, having earned $10 million for both Look Who's Talking (1989) and Look Who's Talking Too (1990) as well as $5 million for Die Hard (1989) and $7.5 million for Die Hard 2 (1990).[4]
And so? I suppose this helps to say "So Moore probably wasn't doing it because she needed the money"; but I think the starstruck account of her own huge earnings have already made this point. -- Hoary ( talk) 00:39, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:LOTD) 02:58, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Ok then...looks pretty good at first glance:
More to come. Finally, not really an issue here but if this were going to FAC, a paragraph on
pregnancy fetishism tp place this all in context would be interesting. Cheers,
Casliber (
talk ·
contribs)
01:46, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
What was the " Britney Spears episode in Japan"?
Incidentally, I (mostly in Japan, as it happens) had never heard of this photo till I first encountered this WP article. I don't suppose this means all that much, as I've never been much interested in Leibovitz's photos and I've only been vaguely aware of Demi Moore. (I did see part of the ghastly Ghost, but it bored me and I turned it off halfway.) I'm puzzled and amused by all this talk of the societal impact of this photo -- ah, the inscrutable occidentals!
A couple of weeks ago, a friend and I had some free time on a rainy London evening, read in Time Out that the National Portrait Gallery was open late, and without any particularly high hopes went to see a Vanity Fair portrait exhibition there. There were half a dozen or so superb images (all monochrome), a lot of pleasant images (mostly in monochrome), and a lot of entirely forgettable stuff (mostly in color). The exhibition was expensive and inexplicably crowded with people who seemed impressed. The two of us left early, but not before we'd noticed this photo. So "OR" says it has actually been exhibited in a British national gallery; the catalogue of the exhibition will no doubt confirm this. -- Hoary ( talk) 23:04, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on More Demi Moore. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:10, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
Possible to actually send a message to Demi? Bojac5021 ( talk) 21:27, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
More Demi Moore has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
February 23, 2008. The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that in
More Demi Moore,
Demi Moore appeared on the cover of
Vanity Fair eight-months pregnant and wearing only a
diamond ring? |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Demi your still the most beautiful woman in the world
We read: The use of a pregnant sex symbol was in a sense an attempt to combat the pop culture representations of the anathema of the awkward, uncomfortable, and grotesquely excessive female form in a culture that covets thinness. And in another sense an attempt to draw attention to the mag and sell more copies, I'd guess. But forget that; instead, the former. How do we know?
Leibovitz' open and direct portrayal led to divided opinions. The photograph was highly provocative.... It was? I see a photo of a pregnant woman done up very elegantly and covering her naughty bits. What am I missing? -- Hoary ( talk) 00:20, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
We read (after markup stripping): Willis was already an A-list star, having earned $10 million for both Look Who's Talking (1989) and Look Who's Talking Too (1990) as well as $5 million for Die Hard (1989) and $7.5 million for Die Hard 2 (1990).[4]
And so? I suppose this helps to say "So Moore probably wasn't doing it because she needed the money"; but I think the starstruck account of her own huge earnings have already made this point. -- Hoary ( talk) 00:39, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:LOTD) 02:58, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Ok then...looks pretty good at first glance:
More to come. Finally, not really an issue here but if this were going to FAC, a paragraph on
pregnancy fetishism tp place this all in context would be interesting. Cheers,
Casliber (
talk ·
contribs)
01:46, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
What was the " Britney Spears episode in Japan"?
Incidentally, I (mostly in Japan, as it happens) had never heard of this photo till I first encountered this WP article. I don't suppose this means all that much, as I've never been much interested in Leibovitz's photos and I've only been vaguely aware of Demi Moore. (I did see part of the ghastly Ghost, but it bored me and I turned it off halfway.) I'm puzzled and amused by all this talk of the societal impact of this photo -- ah, the inscrutable occidentals!
A couple of weeks ago, a friend and I had some free time on a rainy London evening, read in Time Out that the National Portrait Gallery was open late, and without any particularly high hopes went to see a Vanity Fair portrait exhibition there. There were half a dozen or so superb images (all monochrome), a lot of pleasant images (mostly in monochrome), and a lot of entirely forgettable stuff (mostly in color). The exhibition was expensive and inexplicably crowded with people who seemed impressed. The two of us left early, but not before we'd noticed this photo. So "OR" says it has actually been exhibited in a British national gallery; the catalogue of the exhibition will no doubt confirm this. -- Hoary ( talk) 23:04, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on More Demi Moore. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:10, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
Possible to actually send a message to Demi? Bojac5021 ( talk) 21:27, 14 February 2023 (UTC)