A fact from Monturaqui appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 July 2021 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that Monturaqui crater in Chile is threatened by human action?
Talk:Monturaqui is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use
geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the
project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chile, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Chile on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChileWikipedia:WikiProject ChileTemplate:WikiProject ChileChile articles
" The crater was discovered in 1966." - this can be read as that it was first found then, when the body indicates that it was known as early as 1962. Recommend rephrasing this somehow to reflect that. Maybe "identified" instead of "discovered"?
"In 2017, several Chilean organizations and the community of Peine petitioned the Chilean government to declare the site a historic monument. - This sentence contains what appears to be an incorrect link to a place in Germany
I have a script that detects harv and sfn errors installed, and it is flagging that you have defined a source named Buhler1988 in the reflist but that it is not used
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Hi
Jo-Jo Eumerus, review follows; QPQ carried out; article promoted to GA on 3 July; article is well written and cited inline to reliable sources throughout; I can't access many of the sources but a spotcheck found no issues with overly close paraphrasing; hook fact is interesting, mentioned in the article and is cited to a reliable source; AGF that subscription-only source supports the hook; image is OK, maybe a bit wide, and freely licensed. Great article, just one note that you may want to covert one of the reference titles (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) from all caps to title case -
Dumelow (
talk)
10:50, 5 July 2021 (UTC)reply
A fact from Monturaqui appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 July 2021 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that Monturaqui crater in Chile is threatened by human action?
Talk:Monturaqui is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use
geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the
project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chile, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Chile on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChileWikipedia:WikiProject ChileTemplate:WikiProject ChileChile articles
" The crater was discovered in 1966." - this can be read as that it was first found then, when the body indicates that it was known as early as 1962. Recommend rephrasing this somehow to reflect that. Maybe "identified" instead of "discovered"?
"In 2017, several Chilean organizations and the community of Peine petitioned the Chilean government to declare the site a historic monument. - This sentence contains what appears to be an incorrect link to a place in Germany
I have a script that detects harv and sfn errors installed, and it is flagging that you have defined a source named Buhler1988 in the reflist but that it is not used
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Hi
Jo-Jo Eumerus, review follows; QPQ carried out; article promoted to GA on 3 July; article is well written and cited inline to reliable sources throughout; I can't access many of the sources but a spotcheck found no issues with overly close paraphrasing; hook fact is interesting, mentioned in the article and is cited to a reliable source; AGF that subscription-only source supports the hook; image is OK, maybe a bit wide, and freely licensed. Great article, just one note that you may want to covert one of the reference titles (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) from all caps to title case -
Dumelow (
talk)
10:50, 5 July 2021 (UTC)reply