GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Dr. Kadzi ( talk · contribs) 21:04, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
Accepted Review: Is well written, respets laws and is clear and concise. Verifiable Very neutral, has the makings of a good article, good sources. Very well done!
Since there have been a few concerns over this review, which I echo, I will take over reviewing responsibility. T C N7JM 21:50, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
Though the highway has already technically passed the review, these issues really should be fixed. T C N7JM 22:13, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Dr. Kadzi ( talk · contribs) 21:04, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
Accepted Review: Is well written, respets laws and is clear and concise. Verifiable Very neutral, has the makings of a good article, good sources. Very well done!
Since there have been a few concerns over this review, which I echo, I will take over reviewing responsibility. T C N7JM 21:50, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
Though the highway has already technically passed the review, these issues really should be fixed. T C N7JM 22:13, 10 August 2013 (UTC)