This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Mons, Belgium article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
R.A.E.C Mons isn´t a famous club!! and the battle of mons wasn´t the first battle fought by the british! Verduna was before, marne too!—Preceding unsigned comment added by Vermesan ( talk • contribs) 00:58, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
Wow. That is way too many pictures for an encyclopedia article. I suggest someone get an admin to transwiki most of them to Commons! -- Coolcaesar 02:13, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
Having proofread this entire translated page, I am shocked to see how much longer the original French page is. I believe that the translator should work at enlarging the English page to match the original. Alexneophile ( talk) 01:38, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
The English text reads like an uncorrected machine translation, and at some points is simply not even comprehensible. It really ought to be revised. Notapussycat ( talk) 02:56, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Consensus to move ( non-admin closure) ( t · c) buidhe 19:41, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
– (also rename
Category:Mons category tree) Mixed results here. This city is the main result in a Google Books search for mons -author:mons
, but Google Scholar shows almost entirely uses of
mons (planetary nomenclature). A third topic by this name also appears in Scholar and gets
overwhelmingly more pageviews. Overall this points to there being
no primary topic.
Hameltion (
talk |
contribs) 19:13, 3 January 2024 (UTC) — Relisting.
ModernDayTrilobite (
talk •
contribs) 16:45, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Mons, Belgium article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
R.A.E.C Mons isn´t a famous club!! and the battle of mons wasn´t the first battle fought by the british! Verduna was before, marne too!—Preceding unsigned comment added by Vermesan ( talk • contribs) 00:58, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
Wow. That is way too many pictures for an encyclopedia article. I suggest someone get an admin to transwiki most of them to Commons! -- Coolcaesar 02:13, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
Having proofread this entire translated page, I am shocked to see how much longer the original French page is. I believe that the translator should work at enlarging the English page to match the original. Alexneophile ( talk) 01:38, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
The English text reads like an uncorrected machine translation, and at some points is simply not even comprehensible. It really ought to be revised. Notapussycat ( talk) 02:56, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Consensus to move ( non-admin closure) ( t · c) buidhe 19:41, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
– (also rename
Category:Mons category tree) Mixed results here. This city is the main result in a Google Books search for mons -author:mons
, but Google Scholar shows almost entirely uses of
mons (planetary nomenclature). A third topic by this name also appears in Scholar and gets
overwhelmingly more pageviews. Overall this points to there being
no primary topic.
Hameltion (
talk |
contribs) 19:13, 3 January 2024 (UTC) — Relisting.
ModernDayTrilobite (
talk •
contribs) 16:45, 11 January 2024 (UTC)