![]() | Monotron ( final version) received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which on 13 April 2023 was archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
![]() | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | Monotron has been listed as one of the
Music good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: May 24, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | A fact from Monotron appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 7 February 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result was: promoted by
Bruxton (
talk)
21:42, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Converted from a redirect by Schminnte ( talk). Self-nominated at 02:25, 22 January 2023 (UTC).
@ Narutolovehinata5: I've added two new hooks which are variations of the originals. Please check them out. Schminnte ( talk • contribs) 10:28, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
@ Narutolovehinata5: I've updated alt2, will that do? Schminnte ( talk • contribs) 13:10, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Jonathanischoice ( talk · contribs) 05:04, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
@ Schminnte: hi, I thought I'd return the favour and review this article for you :) I'll get started either tonight or (more likely) tomorrow evening (NZST), and leave comments in the template below. Cheers! — Jon ( talk) 05:04, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
@ Schminnte: I've put a list of comments here in a separate section, and then I'll re-assess remaining criteria afterwards (rather than trying to match each point with a criterion). I should also stress that I think this article is very good, well researched and presented, and I suspect I'm basically nit-picking at this point...! — Jon ( talk) 21:41, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
lang
parameter to indicate it is in Spanish); one will suffice (§ Monotron). Similarly, three refs to say that the VCF is the same one used in the MS-10 and MS-20 (§ Design); two to support that the Duo was exhibited at NAMM; and so on. If extra references are not being re-used elsewhere, consider adding them to the External links section instead (or stashing them on the talk page for later).work
or publisher
(e.g.
Sound on Sound) it is only necessary to link the first occurrence in a reference, in keeping with MOS linking....there is no problem with repeating the same link in many citations within an article.
He believed that the Monotron being used for modifications was a by-product of the synthesiser's analogue circuits...could be something like "While acknowledging that the labeling and schematics helped, he believed that the Monotron being used for modifications was also a by-product of..."
(Criteria marked
are unassessed)
![]() | Monotron ( final version) received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which on 13 April 2023 was archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
![]() | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | Monotron has been listed as one of the
Music good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: May 24, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | A fact from Monotron appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 7 February 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result was: promoted by
Bruxton (
talk)
21:42, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Converted from a redirect by Schminnte ( talk). Self-nominated at 02:25, 22 January 2023 (UTC).
@ Narutolovehinata5: I've added two new hooks which are variations of the originals. Please check them out. Schminnte ( talk • contribs) 10:28, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
@ Narutolovehinata5: I've updated alt2, will that do? Schminnte ( talk • contribs) 13:10, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Jonathanischoice ( talk · contribs) 05:04, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
@ Schminnte: hi, I thought I'd return the favour and review this article for you :) I'll get started either tonight or (more likely) tomorrow evening (NZST), and leave comments in the template below. Cheers! — Jon ( talk) 05:04, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
@ Schminnte: I've put a list of comments here in a separate section, and then I'll re-assess remaining criteria afterwards (rather than trying to match each point with a criterion). I should also stress that I think this article is very good, well researched and presented, and I suspect I'm basically nit-picking at this point...! — Jon ( talk) 21:41, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
lang
parameter to indicate it is in Spanish); one will suffice (§ Monotron). Similarly, three refs to say that the VCF is the same one used in the MS-10 and MS-20 (§ Design); two to support that the Duo was exhibited at NAMM; and so on. If extra references are not being re-used elsewhere, consider adding them to the External links section instead (or stashing them on the talk page for later).work
or publisher
(e.g.
Sound on Sound) it is only necessary to link the first occurrence in a reference, in keeping with MOS linking....there is no problem with repeating the same link in many citations within an article.
He believed that the Monotron being used for modifications was a by-product of the synthesiser's analogue circuits...could be something like "While acknowledging that the labeling and schematics helped, he believed that the Monotron being used for modifications was also a by-product of..."
(Criteria marked
are unassessed)