I have tried to clean up the page a fair bit but I think we need another expert who is a proponent of the ideals of monistic idealism. I have put down a few unbiased statements about physics because that is my field of expertise. Amit Goswami seems to be an expert in this field so maybe he could add some information. Although, the article already contains a very long quote of his and I am concerned of bias. I would also strongly suggest a name change to capitalize both words. Edmonds Jan 2011 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.14.255.124 ( talk) 22:20, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
This page does indeed need a lot of work, I actually think it was better before the recent changes. It clearly shows bias against the theory, particularly with the final assessment of Amit Goswami. If such information is included, it should be under a "criticism" section, as with most other wiki articles. I might also suggest that there are a plethora of possible authors which might be quoted for this page, including Gregg Braden from his book "The Divine Matrix," Michael Talbot from his book "The Holographic Universe," and numerous channeled, hypnotically regressed, and otherwise "paranormal" information sources which also support this theory. -Prometheus, 1/26/2011 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.178.67.163 ( talk) 00:51, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
If there are no objections, I'll move for this article to be merged into Idealism and its specific contents deleted or transferred to more specific and substantive pages within the week. - Silence ( talk) 07:59, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
I have tried to clean up the page a fair bit but I think we need another expert who is a proponent of the ideals of monistic idealism. I have put down a few unbiased statements about physics because that is my field of expertise. Amit Goswami seems to be an expert in this field so maybe he could add some information. Although, the article already contains a very long quote of his and I am concerned of bias. I would also strongly suggest a name change to capitalize both words. Edmonds Jan 2011 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.14.255.124 ( talk) 22:20, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
This page does indeed need a lot of work, I actually think it was better before the recent changes. It clearly shows bias against the theory, particularly with the final assessment of Amit Goswami. If such information is included, it should be under a "criticism" section, as with most other wiki articles. I might also suggest that there are a plethora of possible authors which might be quoted for this page, including Gregg Braden from his book "The Divine Matrix," Michael Talbot from his book "The Holographic Universe," and numerous channeled, hypnotically regressed, and otherwise "paranormal" information sources which also support this theory. -Prometheus, 1/26/2011 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.178.67.163 ( talk) 00:51, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
If there are no objections, I'll move for this article to be merged into Idealism and its specific contents deleted or transferred to more specific and substantive pages within the week. - Silence ( talk) 07:59, 24 November 2011 (UTC)