A fact from Mona Lisa replicas and reinterpretations appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 15 April 2013 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Although factual and grammatical corrections & contributions are welcome and appreciated, I'd like some respect afforded to the general layout of images, at least for the time being. I've already deleted to satisfy initial concerns, but I stand by the layout as it now exists. I think the images maintain a certain flow, without leaving expanses of text and inter-sectional negative space. Being in fact a NEW form of encyclopedia, ladies and gentlemen, certain leeway should be afforded, especially as I have specific background in such matters. Furthermore, additional images have been solicited to illustrate specific points noted in the article, and interim editing of images will disrupt upcoming edits. All suggestions are welcome, but should first be noted here. I hope I'm not out of line in this respect, and I appreciate the privilege of being a contributor, but there's still something to be said about not stepping on people's feet. I won't step on yours. Penwatchdog ( talk) 16:14, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
I've removed some that seemed to me really bad. There may be others. e.g. the link to the Japan Times [1] doesn't go to the target. Star767 ( talk) 02:07, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
All da Vincis and Monas have been duly corrected. Headers have been revised to specify artworks, along with pertinent Main article links. Unnecessary bolds have been thinned. Updated the url for a Japan Times source (didn't alter any other info within that reference; hope that doesn't cause a problem). I'll spend free time this weekend composing suggested additions and expansions using source material which has come to my attention. Your continued interest and input are welcome. Penwatchdog ( talk) 05:51, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
Now accepting the next round of critique and assistance! Penwatchdog ( talk) 08:02, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Mona Lisa replicas and reinterpretations. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 11:20, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Mona Lisa replicas and reinterpretations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:47, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 09:00, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
This Spiegel article talks about a Mona Lisa copy currently auctioned at Christie's (see their website). They claim it's early 17th century, painter unknown, worth estimated 200-300k€.
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 03:01, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
A fact from Mona Lisa replicas and reinterpretations appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 15 April 2013 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Although factual and grammatical corrections & contributions are welcome and appreciated, I'd like some respect afforded to the general layout of images, at least for the time being. I've already deleted to satisfy initial concerns, but I stand by the layout as it now exists. I think the images maintain a certain flow, without leaving expanses of text and inter-sectional negative space. Being in fact a NEW form of encyclopedia, ladies and gentlemen, certain leeway should be afforded, especially as I have specific background in such matters. Furthermore, additional images have been solicited to illustrate specific points noted in the article, and interim editing of images will disrupt upcoming edits. All suggestions are welcome, but should first be noted here. I hope I'm not out of line in this respect, and I appreciate the privilege of being a contributor, but there's still something to be said about not stepping on people's feet. I won't step on yours. Penwatchdog ( talk) 16:14, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
I've removed some that seemed to me really bad. There may be others. e.g. the link to the Japan Times [1] doesn't go to the target. Star767 ( talk) 02:07, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
All da Vincis and Monas have been duly corrected. Headers have been revised to specify artworks, along with pertinent Main article links. Unnecessary bolds have been thinned. Updated the url for a Japan Times source (didn't alter any other info within that reference; hope that doesn't cause a problem). I'll spend free time this weekend composing suggested additions and expansions using source material which has come to my attention. Your continued interest and input are welcome. Penwatchdog ( talk) 05:51, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
Now accepting the next round of critique and assistance! Penwatchdog ( talk) 08:02, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Mona Lisa replicas and reinterpretations. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 11:20, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Mona Lisa replicas and reinterpretations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:47, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 09:00, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
This Spiegel article talks about a Mona Lisa copy currently auctioned at Christie's (see their website). They claim it's early 17th century, painter unknown, worth estimated 200-300k€.
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 03:01, 18 February 2023 (UTC)