This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contents of the Adoptation page were merged into Molecular drive on January 3, 2011. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
The contents of the TRAM (genetic) page were merged into Molecular drive on January 3, 2011. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Having come across Adoptation while searching for misspellings, I was put off by the term-as-pun cuteness. So I'm not exactly neutral.
However, having looked around it seems that someone plucked interesting terms out of Gabriel Dover's papers and made near dictionary definition items from them. While it is possible that someone might search using these terms it would seem that they would best be demonstrated within a larger topic, either here at Molecular drive or Gabriel Dover.
I note that
and the neither article has been added to for 10-11 months.
These articles are dreadfully isolated and need to be merged into one or the other context. Shenme ( talk) 03:42, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
The molecular drive theory gives a mechanism for preserve mutations that gives a new characteristic or innovation that other wiles will be eliminate by natural selection. Them the natural selection effect is the survive of the individuals who compensate better this innovation. With out innovation, evolution can not be explain.
There are many
non-Mendelian hereditary mechanisms that can explain how a non beneficial mutation can dominate in a population. If this mutation have a neutral effect there is not innovation and in consequence not evolution; if the effect is very negative the natural selection will eliminate the individual, population or spice affected; finally, there is the case when natural selection will aloud the survive of this innovate population that finally can be drive tho a new branch of life. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Liz de Quebec (
talk •
contribs)
02:25, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contents of the Adoptation page were merged into Molecular drive on January 3, 2011. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
The contents of the TRAM (genetic) page were merged into Molecular drive on January 3, 2011. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Having come across Adoptation while searching for misspellings, I was put off by the term-as-pun cuteness. So I'm not exactly neutral.
However, having looked around it seems that someone plucked interesting terms out of Gabriel Dover's papers and made near dictionary definition items from them. While it is possible that someone might search using these terms it would seem that they would best be demonstrated within a larger topic, either here at Molecular drive or Gabriel Dover.
I note that
and the neither article has been added to for 10-11 months.
These articles are dreadfully isolated and need to be merged into one or the other context. Shenme ( talk) 03:42, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
The molecular drive theory gives a mechanism for preserve mutations that gives a new characteristic or innovation that other wiles will be eliminate by natural selection. Them the natural selection effect is the survive of the individuals who compensate better this innovation. With out innovation, evolution can not be explain.
There are many
non-Mendelian hereditary mechanisms that can explain how a non beneficial mutation can dominate in a population. If this mutation have a neutral effect there is not innovation and in consequence not evolution; if the effect is very negative the natural selection will eliminate the individual, population or spice affected; finally, there is the case when natural selection will aloud the survive of this innovate population that finally can be drive tho a new branch of life. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Liz de Quebec (
talk •
contribs)
02:25, 7 January 2011 (UTC)