This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The article at present could use a more neutral point of view. Observations such as "The tools and user interface are somewhat peculiar and need some training to get used to it" are individual opinions, and should be omitted or rephrased. The necessity of training is to be expected in any complex software. Listing of pros and cons is fine, of course, but try to keep with statements of objective fact. -- TouchGnome 20:50, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
This software is not notable and this article is in fact just an advertisement. This should be removed. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
99.232.23.203 (
talk)
23:06, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The article at present could use a more neutral point of view. Observations such as "The tools and user interface are somewhat peculiar and need some training to get used to it" are individual opinions, and should be omitted or rephrased. The necessity of training is to be expected in any complex software. Listing of pros and cons is fine, of course, but try to keep with statements of objective fact. -- TouchGnome 20:50, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
This software is not notable and this article is in fact just an advertisement. This should be removed. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
99.232.23.203 (
talk)
23:06, 29 January 2010 (UTC)