This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Mohammad Hamid Ansari article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Mohammad Hamid Ansari received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Welcome! Please help expand the article. Do support your claims with credible sources. Thanking You, Altruism To talk 13:19, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
why is his name written in telegu? hindi and urdu i can understand (he's from UP, mother tongue Urdu) but telegu? If anything his name should be written in Bengali, he's been born and brought up in calcutta and even did undergrad there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.224.206.237 ( talk) 03:47, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
Unfortunately, i removed the controversy tab since there was no proper referencing. Abhinav619 22.08, 4 January 2012
Any relationship between Vice President Ansari with - Abdul Hamid Ansari, Congressman and founder of Inquilab Publications in 1938 and - Khalid_A._H._Ansari chairman of Mid-day ? Prodigyhk ( talk) 03:12, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Mohammad Hamid Ansari. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:19, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
One editor removed the links in the controversy by citing the reason that it is not reliable source. After I read the complete article WP:RS and WP:BLP, I came on conclusion that Sunday guardian live and Times Now news both are the reliable and established media group. Also, I didn’t do any original research but I just added the links from newspaper website. Even I didn’t add Swarajya’s article, because some editors think it’s propaganda portal. Now, Times now and Sunday Guardian are also not reliable? What’s the reference for stating this? From where, this conclusion was drawn?
Another thing is I mentioned term “accused”, I didn’t say that he did this thing by putting Wikipedia as primary source. I didn’t cite any self published source as reference. What’s wrong in mentioning that person is accused? It’s reported in the reputed newspapers and websites. I think it’s not violation of any policy and those edits must be reverted without taking it personally.
— Harshil169 ( talk) 03:53, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Regarding times now, I can read only yours opinion on the page. I didn’t find any type of conclusion on the page which says that this sites are prohibited on Wikipedia, it loooks merely personal opinion and I respect it. Thanks for notifying but if any consensus will be there which prohibits the sites then I won’t add it. Try to come on conclusion with discussions. — Harshil169 ( talk) 08:23, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
I am new to this but the Sunday Guardian is an Indian paper in London owned by MJ Akbar, a reputed journalist and former editor of Asian Age in Delhi. One would think they have unique connections in and insight into India issues. And the charge reported [1] is made not by Akbar or the publisher, it comes from a former R&AW agent who is identified and pictured. The past affiliation of TSG's owner doesn't negate the quality of the source. If the source was dubious on fictitious (etc.) it would be a different matter. Sooku ( talk) 02:39, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
References
There has been a blanking and subsequent revert of the blank of the controversy section, involving TTP1233 and 25 Cents FC, there has been another blank on the controversy section by an anon (157.35.52.222) so I reverted based on the previous revert. If anyone objects to the revert, I think it would be best if you replied to this section, but just reverting back is also probably fine. Just pinging everyone so we can generate consensus here. Just i yaya 06:48, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Comment:I don't think I am involved here. I just edit only on infoboxes. Please give me a reference on my edit so that I can remember and answer you back again Justiyaya.
Thanking you,
-- Jyoti Roy ( talk) 15:52, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Mohammad Hamid Ansari article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Mohammad Hamid Ansari received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Welcome! Please help expand the article. Do support your claims with credible sources. Thanking You, Altruism To talk 13:19, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
why is his name written in telegu? hindi and urdu i can understand (he's from UP, mother tongue Urdu) but telegu? If anything his name should be written in Bengali, he's been born and brought up in calcutta and even did undergrad there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.224.206.237 ( talk) 03:47, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
Unfortunately, i removed the controversy tab since there was no proper referencing. Abhinav619 22.08, 4 January 2012
Any relationship between Vice President Ansari with - Abdul Hamid Ansari, Congressman and founder of Inquilab Publications in 1938 and - Khalid_A._H._Ansari chairman of Mid-day ? Prodigyhk ( talk) 03:12, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Mohammad Hamid Ansari. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:19, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
One editor removed the links in the controversy by citing the reason that it is not reliable source. After I read the complete article WP:RS and WP:BLP, I came on conclusion that Sunday guardian live and Times Now news both are the reliable and established media group. Also, I didn’t do any original research but I just added the links from newspaper website. Even I didn’t add Swarajya’s article, because some editors think it’s propaganda portal. Now, Times now and Sunday Guardian are also not reliable? What’s the reference for stating this? From where, this conclusion was drawn?
Another thing is I mentioned term “accused”, I didn’t say that he did this thing by putting Wikipedia as primary source. I didn’t cite any self published source as reference. What’s wrong in mentioning that person is accused? It’s reported in the reputed newspapers and websites. I think it’s not violation of any policy and those edits must be reverted without taking it personally.
— Harshil169 ( talk) 03:53, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Regarding times now, I can read only yours opinion on the page. I didn’t find any type of conclusion on the page which says that this sites are prohibited on Wikipedia, it loooks merely personal opinion and I respect it. Thanks for notifying but if any consensus will be there which prohibits the sites then I won’t add it. Try to come on conclusion with discussions. — Harshil169 ( talk) 08:23, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
I am new to this but the Sunday Guardian is an Indian paper in London owned by MJ Akbar, a reputed journalist and former editor of Asian Age in Delhi. One would think they have unique connections in and insight into India issues. And the charge reported [1] is made not by Akbar or the publisher, it comes from a former R&AW agent who is identified and pictured. The past affiliation of TSG's owner doesn't negate the quality of the source. If the source was dubious on fictitious (etc.) it would be a different matter. Sooku ( talk) 02:39, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
References
There has been a blanking and subsequent revert of the blank of the controversy section, involving TTP1233 and 25 Cents FC, there has been another blank on the controversy section by an anon (157.35.52.222) so I reverted based on the previous revert. If anyone objects to the revert, I think it would be best if you replied to this section, but just reverting back is also probably fine. Just pinging everyone so we can generate consensus here. Just i yaya 06:48, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Comment:I don't think I am involved here. I just edit only on infoboxes. Please give me a reference on my edit so that I can remember and answer you back again Justiyaya.
Thanking you,
-- Jyoti Roy ( talk) 15:52, 24 September 2021 (UTC)