This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Modes of mechanical ventilation article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
merged high frequency ventilation into this article. if there are any other articles that should be merged, post the merge thing to their talk pages and lets get this article complete and comprehensive! Je.rrt ( talk) 22:56, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Je.rrt ( talk • contribs) 03:34, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
PEEP - coming soon
ASV - coming soon
PAV - coming soon
IRV -
VVP - coming soon
MODE - Mode introductory explaination in its most basic function. Futher explaination regarding alternative names of the mode. An advanced explaination of the physics regarding ventilation in this mode is great but language needs to be basic.
Uses for this mode and why. Indications and contraindications for this mode and why. Additional considerations would go here too.
Variables related to the mode and now they apply to the mode.
Expected outcome with the use of this mode
Je.rrt ( talk) 17:02, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
I think it should be restructured to be a little easier to understand:
Pulmonological ( talk) 17:54, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
We probably need to talk about ventilator cycling as its own section, where we talk about patient cycle, time cycle, pressure cycle, volume cycle etc. That way the further reading down the article makes more sense about the different modes that exist (Pressure-control CMV vs Volume-control CMV). We also need to rewrite a lot of this to represent current nomenclature but without having to mention the several other previous used terms every time we do. Pulmonological ( talk) 12:33, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
This article is much more structured but it is still not as clear and misleading on some topics | pulmonological talk • contribs 22:08, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Modes of mechanical ventilation article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
merged high frequency ventilation into this article. if there are any other articles that should be merged, post the merge thing to their talk pages and lets get this article complete and comprehensive! Je.rrt ( talk) 22:56, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Je.rrt ( talk • contribs) 03:34, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
PEEP - coming soon
ASV - coming soon
PAV - coming soon
IRV -
VVP - coming soon
MODE - Mode introductory explaination in its most basic function. Futher explaination regarding alternative names of the mode. An advanced explaination of the physics regarding ventilation in this mode is great but language needs to be basic.
Uses for this mode and why. Indications and contraindications for this mode and why. Additional considerations would go here too.
Variables related to the mode and now they apply to the mode.
Expected outcome with the use of this mode
Je.rrt ( talk) 17:02, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
I think it should be restructured to be a little easier to understand:
Pulmonological ( talk) 17:54, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
We probably need to talk about ventilator cycling as its own section, where we talk about patient cycle, time cycle, pressure cycle, volume cycle etc. That way the further reading down the article makes more sense about the different modes that exist (Pressure-control CMV vs Volume-control CMV). We also need to rewrite a lot of this to represent current nomenclature but without having to mention the several other previous used terms every time we do. Pulmonological ( talk) 12:33, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
This article is much more structured but it is still not as clear and misleading on some topics | pulmonological talk • contribs 22:08, 12 July 2012 (UTC)