From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Please note that the content was not all copied from the above article, rather much of it was transcluded from other articles, and may have unrelated content. SandyGeorgia ( Talk)

Problematic

This article was created via a problematic split from Criticism of the Catholic Church; see Talk:Criticism of the Catholic Church#Other side of the same coin and the sections above that section. Transclusions may need to be removed, as they appear to have been added with little care as to to reviewing the content to determine if there was actually reliably sourced criticism in the transcluded content. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 04:08, 29 April 2019 (UTC) reply

This page was only created after a consensus decided to split the page at Talk:Criticism of the Catholic Church.-- Epiphyllumlover ( talk) 04:19, 29 April 2019 (UTC) reply
This is misleading. As you know, the problem is not only that you split the article (which was my suggestion) with consensus (of only one editor in how you would split). The problem is that you did NOT split content from Criticism of the Catholic Church; you also transcluded content from other articles, that may or may not have reliably sourced content, and you demonstrably did this with little care, as you have been shown examples where you liberally transcluded pages with no content critical of the Catholic church. You have used transclusion as a blunt tool without regard for the text you are transcluding. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 04:42, 29 April 2019 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Please note that the content was not all copied from the above article, rather much of it was transcluded from other articles, and may have unrelated content. SandyGeorgia ( Talk)

Problematic

This article was created via a problematic split from Criticism of the Catholic Church; see Talk:Criticism of the Catholic Church#Other side of the same coin and the sections above that section. Transclusions may need to be removed, as they appear to have been added with little care as to to reviewing the content to determine if there was actually reliably sourced criticism in the transcluded content. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 04:08, 29 April 2019 (UTC) reply

This page was only created after a consensus decided to split the page at Talk:Criticism of the Catholic Church.-- Epiphyllumlover ( talk) 04:19, 29 April 2019 (UTC) reply
This is misleading. As you know, the problem is not only that you split the article (which was my suggestion) with consensus (of only one editor in how you would split). The problem is that you did NOT split content from Criticism of the Catholic Church; you also transcluded content from other articles, that may or may not have reliably sourced content, and you demonstrably did this with little care, as you have been shown examples where you liberally transcluded pages with no content critical of the Catholic church. You have used transclusion as a blunt tool without regard for the text you are transcluding. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 04:42, 29 April 2019 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook