This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the
project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
A news item involving Mmusi and Others v Ramantele and Another was featured on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the In the news section on 12 October 2012.
Shorten the title?
Normally in American jurisprudence, articles for notable cases are shortened to a base of primary plaintiff v. primary defendant. I think this article's title ought to be shortened to Mmusi v Ramantele, to follow a similar format. --
Kitch(
Talk :
Contrib) 16:44, 14 October 2012 (UTC)reply
Is this the same in Botswana jurisprudence? Without a source that refers to this case by your proposed new title, I'd be uncomfortable changing it.
Khazar2 (
talk) 17:13, 14 October 2012 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the
project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
A news item involving Mmusi and Others v Ramantele and Another was featured on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the In the news section on 12 October 2012.
Shorten the title?
Normally in American jurisprudence, articles for notable cases are shortened to a base of primary plaintiff v. primary defendant. I think this article's title ought to be shortened to Mmusi v Ramantele, to follow a similar format. --
Kitch(
Talk :
Contrib) 16:44, 14 October 2012 (UTC)reply
Is this the same in Botswana jurisprudence? Without a source that refers to this case by your proposed new title, I'd be uncomfortable changing it.
Khazar2 (
talk) 17:13, 14 October 2012 (UTC)reply