This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Mitterrand鈥揚asqua affair article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources:聽 Google ( books聽路 news聽路 scholar聽路 free images聽路 WP聽refs)聽路 FENS聽路 JSTOR聽路 TWL |
A news item involving Mitterrand鈥揚asqua affair was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 28 October 2009. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Perspicacite, can you explain this revert? I hear that the Figaro contradicts the other source on the worth of the deals, maybe this should be underlined聽? Why privilege an English-speaking source over Le Figaro? And why remove the paragraph about Angolan personalities? Tazmaniacs 16:00, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
The following paragraph is interesting...: "On the Angolan side, several names appeared during the investigations, although they have not been indicted by the French justice. These included the president Eduardo Dos Santos, the Minister of Industry Joaquim David, the Angolan ambassador in Paris, Eliseo Figuereido, who would have organized meetings with Falcone, the secretary of the Council of Ministers Jose Leitao Da Costa, the General Fernando Araujo, a counsellor of president Dos Santos, Maria Do Carmo,the spouse of Leitao, and Alexandre Nuno, a cousin of Leitao"
...but it doesnt go into any real detail. In terms of improving the overall article the roles these individuals played needs to be spelled out. Perspicacite 18:13, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
The intro says there was US gov. and business man involvement, but I'm not seeing that in the article. Can someone elaborate on what it was or remove that sentence? 鈥擯receding unsigned comment added by 204.52.215.67 ( talk) 00:49, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
What is the relevance of these three individuals to this article? Picaroon (t) 03:12, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
Angologate is a colloquial name and i don't think it should be the title. Mitterand-Pasqua Affair would be much more fitting title because there is no reason to relate this incident to watergate. -- Givengels ( talk) 00:36, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Mitterrand鈥揚asqua affair. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.鈥 cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 08:15, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Mitterrand鈥揚asqua affair article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources:聽 Google ( books聽路 news聽路 scholar聽路 free images聽路 WP聽refs)聽路 FENS聽路 JSTOR聽路 TWL |
A news item involving Mitterrand鈥揚asqua affair was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 28 October 2009. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Perspicacite, can you explain this revert? I hear that the Figaro contradicts the other source on the worth of the deals, maybe this should be underlined聽? Why privilege an English-speaking source over Le Figaro? And why remove the paragraph about Angolan personalities? Tazmaniacs 16:00, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
The following paragraph is interesting...: "On the Angolan side, several names appeared during the investigations, although they have not been indicted by the French justice. These included the president Eduardo Dos Santos, the Minister of Industry Joaquim David, the Angolan ambassador in Paris, Eliseo Figuereido, who would have organized meetings with Falcone, the secretary of the Council of Ministers Jose Leitao Da Costa, the General Fernando Araujo, a counsellor of president Dos Santos, Maria Do Carmo,the spouse of Leitao, and Alexandre Nuno, a cousin of Leitao"
...but it doesnt go into any real detail. In terms of improving the overall article the roles these individuals played needs to be spelled out. Perspicacite 18:13, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
The intro says there was US gov. and business man involvement, but I'm not seeing that in the article. Can someone elaborate on what it was or remove that sentence? 鈥擯receding unsigned comment added by 204.52.215.67 ( talk) 00:49, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
What is the relevance of these three individuals to this article? Picaroon (t) 03:12, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
Angologate is a colloquial name and i don't think it should be the title. Mitterand-Pasqua Affair would be much more fitting title because there is no reason to relate this incident to watergate. -- Givengels ( talk) 00:36, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Mitterrand鈥揚asqua affair. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.鈥 cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 08:15, 1 March 2016 (UTC)