Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
GA review – see
WP:WIAGA for criteria
This review is part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force/Sweeps, a project devoted to re-reviewing Good Articles listed before August 26, 2007.
{{cn}}
tags were put there as part of my personal little
to do list for the page, including improving the existing citations where blogs have been used. I'm a wee bit busy just now, so the quickest thing is probably to just remove the tags; the facts aren't really contentious, and are referenced.{{cn}}
tag myself. I know I read that somewhere while writing the article, but cannot for the life of me find that original reference. There's a technical reference (now added) which mentions economy of 3.8L/100km though, so that's been put in instead. Hope that sorts things. --
DeLarge (
talk)
12:14, 21 June 2009 (UTC)Thanks for your fast response, good job on the article. Article kept. -- ErgoSum• talk• trib 03:45, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
GA review – see
WP:WIAGA for criteria
This review is part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force/Sweeps, a project devoted to re-reviewing Good Articles listed before August 26, 2007.
{{cn}}
tags were put there as part of my personal little
to do list for the page, including improving the existing citations where blogs have been used. I'm a wee bit busy just now, so the quickest thing is probably to just remove the tags; the facts aren't really contentious, and are referenced.{{cn}}
tag myself. I know I read that somewhere while writing the article, but cannot for the life of me find that original reference. There's a technical reference (now added) which mentions economy of 3.8L/100km though, so that's been put in instead. Hope that sorts things. --
DeLarge (
talk)
12:14, 21 June 2009 (UTC)Thanks for your fast response, good job on the article. Article kept. -- ErgoSum• talk• trib 03:45, 22 June 2009 (UTC)