![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Why are a couple of editors constantly deleting information about the fencing off of Mistley Quay? The bare bones are as follows: In September 2008 a 2-metre high, 130-metre long fence was erected across the quay. A protest group was formed to object to the fence, claiming that it ended 500 years of free access to the water. [1] This seems to me to be entirely appropriate information to include. Could those who disagree please discuss here, rather than just delete? Thanks. SNALWIBMA ( talk - contribs ) 07:36, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
The information about Thorn Quay Warehouse added on 16th March 2014 does not fall within WP:NOTNEWS, because 'editors are encouraged to include current and up-to-date information within [Wikipedia's] coverage' and 'including information on recent developments is sometimes appropriate'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PeterEssexHeritage ( talk • contribs) 21:30, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mistley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:09, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Why are a couple of editors constantly deleting information about the fencing off of Mistley Quay? The bare bones are as follows: In September 2008 a 2-metre high, 130-metre long fence was erected across the quay. A protest group was formed to object to the fence, claiming that it ended 500 years of free access to the water. [1] This seems to me to be entirely appropriate information to include. Could those who disagree please discuss here, rather than just delete? Thanks. SNALWIBMA ( talk - contribs ) 07:36, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
The information about Thorn Quay Warehouse added on 16th March 2014 does not fall within WP:NOTNEWS, because 'editors are encouraged to include current and up-to-date information within [Wikipedia's] coverage' and 'including information on recent developments is sometimes appropriate'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PeterEssexHeritage ( talk • contribs) 21:30, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mistley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:09, 7 December 2017 (UTC)