This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Philosophy: Logic / Ancient / Modern This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles Associated task forces: /  Logic Ancient philosophy Modern philosophy

Now see... I would have taken the word "misology" and interpreted it as "the study of hate/hatred". But that's just me.   ^{.`</sup>^) Paine <sup>diss`cuss} (^^`.  05:36, 18 March 2009 (UTC) reply

Greg, there is no mention of fundamentalism in the text of the article, so why do you insist that this has to be so categorized? Mangoe ( talk) 15:16, 18 January 2013 (UTC) reply

You removed this category from "theological veto" too. I'm not sure you are clear on what religious fundamentalism is. Rejecting logic, and relying on revelation, preaching, scripture is a defining characteristic of religious fundamentalism. Both of these topics are clearly, and directly related. It would seem to me that even a person who embraces religious fundamentalism would agree with this and stand by it proudly. Greg Bard ( talk) 15:53, 18 January 2013 (UTC) reply

Well the fundamentalists do (or at least try to) apply logic in theological debates so fundamentalism is fideism and not necessarily misology. 86.45.226.161 ( talk) 17:27, 8 February 2017 (UTC) reply